Pilnick2006

From emcawiki
Revision as of 12:45, 18 May 2018 by DarceySearles (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Alison Pilnick; Tom Coleman |Title=Death, depression and "defensive expansion": Closing down smoking as an issue for discussion in GP co...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Pilnick2006
BibType ARTICLE
Key Pilnick2006
Author(s) Alison Pilnick, Tom Coleman
Title Death, depression and "defensive expansion": Closing down smoking as an issue for discussion in GP consultations
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Medical EMCA, Medical consultations, Smoking
Publisher
Year 2006
Language English
City
Month
Journal Social Science & Medicine
Volume 62
Number
Pages 2500-2512
URL Link
DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.10.031
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

This paper examines routine primary care consultations in the UK where smoking is discussed using data from a larger study of the factors influencing discussion of smoking between general practitioners (GPs) and patients. In this study, consultations have been analysed with a focus on the termination of discussion about smoking, using an approach that is informed by the conversation analytic (CA) literature on professional/client interaction. In interviews from the previous larger study, GPs suggested two main reasons for not pursuing discussion of smoking in consultations. One reason was an overarching fear of damaging the GP/patient relationship. The second reason related to clinical judgement, where it was feared that an attempt to stop smoking might exacerbate a patient's existing condition, particularly their mental health. This paper suggests that, while this latter scenario of clinical judgement is borne out by the consultation data, there are two more subtle patient behaviours which are associated with GPs abandoning further discussion of smoking: patients’ ‘troubles telling’, where the issue of smoking is de-emphasised in the face of other ‘troubles’, and ‘defensive expansion’, where the patient over-emphasises deficiencies to curtail discussion. Greater awareness of the situations in which doctors end discussion of smoking will help GPs to develop ideas for alternative approaches in these circumstances which could result in more meaningful, effective engagement between doctors and their patients who smoke when smoking is discussed.

Notes