Pilnick2002a
Revision as of 12:22, 18 May 2018 by DarceySearles (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Alison Pilnick; |Title=What 'most people' do: Exploring the ethical implications of genetic counselling |Tag(s)=EMCA; Medical EMCA; Con...")
Pilnick2002a | |
---|---|
BibType | ARTICLE |
Key | Pilnick2002a |
Author(s) | Alison Pilnick |
Title | What 'most people' do: Exploring the ethical implications of genetic counselling |
Editor(s) | |
Tag(s) | EMCA, Medical EMCA, Conversation Analysis, Genetic Counseling, Ethics |
Publisher | |
Year | 2002 |
Language | English |
City | |
Month | |
Journal | New Genetics & Society |
Volume | 21 |
Number | |
Pages | 339-350 |
URL | Link |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1080/14636770216003 |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | |
Chapter |
Abstract
Genetic counselling, and the ethical principles of non-directiveness and client autonomy that counsellors aspire to, are a cornerstone in the defence of genetic practice against accusations of eugenics. This paper examines the practical application of these principles using a conversation analytic approach, arguing that there is a need to pay greater attention to local interactional contexts in analysing counsellors' attainment or otherwise of ethical ideals.
Notes