Laurier2018
Revision as of 02:26, 18 May 2018 by BogdanaHuma (talk | contribs) (BibTeX auto import 2018-05-18 08:26:02)
| Laurier2018 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Laurier2018 |
| Author(s) | Eric Laurier |
| Title | Some thoughts on the Conversational Rollercoaster |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Conversation Analysis, Ethnomethodology, experience, public understanding of science, science fairs, transcription, conversational rollercoaster |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2018 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Discourse Studies |
| Volume | 20 |
| Number | 3 |
| Pages | 438-442 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1177/1461445618754582 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
The commentary provides a series of notes on the article ‘The Conversational Rollercoaster: Conversation analysis and the public science of talk’. There are two broad areas that I attend to: one is on the formulation of the Conversational Rollercoaster in the light of the warrants of ethnomethodology and conversation analysis and the second is around what the Conversational Rollercoaster accomplished.
Notes
