Jacknick-Creider2018

From emcawiki
Revision as of 12:53, 30 April 2018 by ElliottHoey (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Christine Jacknick; Sarah C. Creider |Title=A Chorus Line: Engaging (or Not) with the Open Floor |Tag(s)=EMCA; Multimodality; Choral res...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Jacknick-Creider2018
BibType ARTICLE
Key Jacknick-Creider2018
Author(s) Christine Jacknick, Sarah C. Creider
Title A Chorus Line: Engaging (or Not) with the Open Floor
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Multimodality, Choral responses, Turn-taking
Publisher
Year 2018
Language English
City
Month
Journal Hacettepe University Journal of Education
Volume 33
Number
Pages 72-92
URL Link
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.2018038797
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

Turn-taking in classrooms has long been a topic of interest to discourse analysts, with attention paid to turn allocation in teacher-fronted settings (McHoul, 1978; Mehan, 1979), and recent research identifying teacher practices for managing "competing voices" (Waring, 2013). This study builds on such work, asking how students engage with an open floor in "materials mode" (Walsh, 2006, 2011), where teacher and students are focused on a written text and students respond in apparent chorus. We are interested in looking at students who actively bid for turns as well as those who do not contribute verbally. Based on videotaped data from an English as a Second Language (ESL) classroom and from a college reading class (both in the United States), this multimodal conversation analytic study (Mondada, 2016) identifies relevant interactional resources and practices, including talk, gaze, body position, gesture, and the physical environment. Findings suggest that 1) these apparently mundane interactions are a site for complex actions on the parts of individual students, and 2) the focus on text materials in these exchanges has consequences for participation, including temporality, sequentiality, and turn-taking. Pedagogical implications include problemetizing motivations and objectives for a common classroom ritual.

Notes