Murray1985
Revision as of 05:37, 10 November 2017 by PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Stephen O. Murray |Title=Toward a Model of Members' Methods for Recognizing Interruptions |Tag(s)=EMCA; Turn taking; Califomia English c...")
| Murray1985 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Murray1985 |
| Author(s) | Stephen O. Murray |
| Title | Toward a Model of Members' Methods for Recognizing Interruptions |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Turn taking, Califomia English conversation |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 1985 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Language in Society |
| Volume | 14 |
| Number | 1 |
| Pages | 31-40 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Simultaneous speech is neither necessary nor sufficient for the recognition
of "'interruption" by interlocutors. A opeaker's "completion right" is viti- ated by how long s/he has been speaking, how often s/he has spoken, the number of "points" made in a speaking turn, and the special rights of some speakers to speak about some topics. There are no absolute syntactical or acoustical criteria for recognizing an occurrence of "'interruption" available either to those involved in a speech event nor to analysts.
Notes
