Helisten2017

From emcawiki
Revision as of 06:35, 7 June 2017 by PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Marika Helisten; |Title=Resumptions as multimodal achievements in conversational (story)tellings |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation analys...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Helisten2017
BibType ARTICLE
Key Helisten2017
Author(s) Marika Helisten
Title Resumptions as multimodal achievements in conversational (story)tellings
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Conversation analysis, Conversational storytelling, Multimodality, Resumption, but, anyway
Publisher
Year 2017
Language
City
Month
Journal Journal of Pragmatics
Volume 112
Number
Pages 1-19
URL
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.01.014
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

This paper investigates resumption as a multimodal achievement within (story)telling sequences in English everyday interaction. Resumption here refers to a particular interactional practice where a speaker returns to his/her telling after its progression was temporarily put on hold in favour of an intervening course of action. Returning to an on-hold course of action poses an interactional problem for interlocutors, because, as has been widely established by conversation analytic research (e.g. Sacks et al., 1974; Schegloff, 2007), each utterance is, by default, built upon and understood in relation to the talk of a just-prior utterance. Resumptions are a solution to a practical participant's problem, as they provide interlocutors with systematic means to make it known to their co-participants that what comes next is not a continuation of just-prior talk or the start of some new course of action, but rather, a return to a previously halted, unfinished course of action. Within the framework of conversation analysis, this study provides a close examination of resumptions in their interactional and sequential context. It focuses on a recurrent linguistic format identified in the data, namely, resumptions prefaced with the discourse markers but and anyway. However, video data reveals that simply focusing on the verbal features of resumptions would provide a somewhat narrow view of how they are accomplished in co-present interaction.

Notes