McHoul2009
Revision as of 07:11, 2 June 2017 by PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Alec McHoul; |Title=What are we doing when we analyse conversation? |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; |Key=McHoul2009 |Year=2...")
McHoul2009 | |
---|---|
BibType | ARTICLE |
Key | McHoul2009 |
Author(s) | Alec McHoul |
Title | What are we doing when we analyse conversation? |
Editor(s) | |
Tag(s) | EMCA, Conversation Analysis |
Publisher | |
Year | 2009 |
Language | |
City | |
Month | |
Journal | Australian Journal of Communication |
Volume | 36 |
Number | 3 |
Pages | 15-21 |
URL | |
DOI | |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | |
Chapter |
Abstract
Here I offer a reminder of some of the phenomenological and ethnomethodological roots of conversation analysis (CA) in the form of a set of ‘field propositions’. Over the years, CA has certainly ‘branched out’ from those roots. However, I believe a reminder is timely if we are to prevent a drift towards a rather mechanistic approach to the study of everyday cultural objects such as conversations and their ilk.
Notes