Lynch2003a
Lynch2003a | |
---|---|
BibType | COLLECTION |
Key | Lynch2003a |
Author(s) | Michael Lynch, Wes Sharrock |
Title | Harold Garfinkel |
Editor(s) | |
Tag(s) | EMCA, Ethnomethodology, Garfinkel |
Publisher | Sage |
Year | 2003 |
Language | |
City | London |
Month | |
Journal | |
Volume | |
Number | |
Pages | |
URL | Link |
DOI | |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | SAGE Masters in Modern Social Thought |
Howpublished | |
Book title | |
Chapter |
Abstract
Born in 1917, Harold Garfinkel is one of a handful of sociologists to have founded a major sociological research programme, and he is perhaps the only one to have done so in the 20th century. Unlike many major theorists, whose individual contributions have become part of the sociological canon, Garfinkel's contribution is identified with a distinctive empirical approach that continues to be taken up in sociology and a number of other social science fields. He coined the term ethnomethodology - to describe a unique orientation to the production of social order. This term became established to describe the approach he founded. His book Studies in Ethnomethodology (1967) was a landmark publication that articulated the ethnomethodological programme and illustrated it with a number of studies. Much of Garfinkel's contribution is embodied in a research programme, consisting of studies written by his students who took up his research agenda.
The four volumes include an introduction by Lynch and Sharrock that discusses Garfinkel's intellectual biography and reviews his contribution. The 80 selections included in the set of volumes consist of basic position statements, critical discussions, methodological writings, discussions of the problem of social reality, comparisons between ethnomethodology and other perspectives, and studies exemplifying Garfinkel's influence at different phases of his long and distinguished career. The result is an unparalleled resource in understanding Garfinkel's achievement and the extraordinary wealth of his sociological ideas and methods.
Notes