Tegler2020a

From emcawiki
Revision as of 07:23, 10 October 2020 by ElliottHoey (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Helena Tegler; Ingrid Demmelmaier; Monica Blom Johansson; Niklas Norén |Title=Creating a response space in multiparty classroom setting...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Tegler2020a
BibType ARTICLE
Key Tegler2020a
Author(s) Helena Tegler, Ingrid Demmelmaier, Monica Blom Johansson, Niklas Norén
Title Creating a response space in multiparty classroom settings for students using eye-gaze accessed speech-generating devices
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, In press, Cerebral palsy, Gaze, Inclusive classrooms, Speech-generating device, Multiparty
Publisher
Year 2020
Language English
City
Month
Journal Augmentative and Alternative Communication
Volume
Number
Pages
URL Link
DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2020.1811758
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

Conversation Analysis was used to explore how teachers, personal care assistants, and students organized inclusive multiparty classroom interaction when one of the students in the classroom used an eye-gaze accessed speech-generating device (SGD). Scaffolding and collaborative practices that created a response space for the construction of the eye-gaze accessed SGD-mediated turn were identified and analyzed. The participants were two adolescent students with severe cerebral palsy and intellectual disability who relied on eye-gaze accessed SGDs, and their teachers, personal care assistants, and classmates with intellectual disabilities. The data consisted of 2 hr and 40 min of video recordings collected in the participants’ classrooms. Three practices were identified (a) the practice of explicit turn allocation organization and the use of display questions, (b) the practice of locally contingent on-screen scaffolding activities, and (c) the practice of dealing with turn competition by classmates. Teacher and assistant practices differed with regard to the student’s access to the vocabulary relevant to answering the teacher’s question. The practices were found to create a response space for students using SGDs accessed via eye gaze, thereby ensuring their educational inclusion in the classroom.

Notes