Kukard-vanRensburg2018

From emcawiki
Revision as of 08:48, 27 January 2019 by ElliottHoey (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Dylan Kukard; Richard van Rensburg |Title=Identity in interaction : sub-cultural intersubjectivities in popular radio conversation on In...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Kukard-vanRensburg2018
BibType ARTICLE
Key Kukard-vanRensburg2018
Author(s) Dylan Kukard, Richard van Rensburg
Title Identity in interaction : sub-cultural intersubjectivities in popular radio conversation on Inxeba
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Identity, Queer, Radio, Epistemics
Publisher
Year 2018
Language English
City
Month
Journal Image & Text
Volume 32
Number 1
Pages 1-20
URL Link
DOI 10.17159/2617-3255/2018/n32a8
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

Queerness undergoes multiple treatments in South African society, oscillating between site of cultural un/acceptability, religious im/morality and of embodied resistance. Conversation of the film Inxeba indicates that claiming or talking about the queer position amongst cultural identities becomes a social act, which must be accounted for within interaction. Through adopting an ethnomethodological position, it can be noted that within instances of radio talk, speakers design their utterances to employ identities as actions, which align orientations to norms regarding sexuality. By deploying a conversation analysis to the collected data, the interrelation between queerness and emotive talk is shown through the ways in which speech features, such as pause and emphasis, are employed strategically. In tandem, an analysis of discursive connotation offers a balance between the local situation and broader context of talk in order to show how queer identities are deployed within other discursive formations. Through tethering these styles of analyses, it will appear that the cascading use of social identities within talk of Inxeba presents as a particular stock of interactional knowledge regarding queerness (based on the three extracts analysed). By reflecting on how the identity of the researchers may have influenced this analysis, managing the reflexive process should not be seen as a final step but rather an instrumental part of any qualitative analysis of identity.

Notes