Ford2012
Revision as of 04:03, 26 February 2016 by AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs)
| Ford2012 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Ford2012 |
| Author(s) | Cecilia E. Ford |
| Title | Clarity in applied and interdisciplinary conversation analysis |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Applied, Conversation Analysis |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2012 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Discourse Studies |
| Volume | 14 |
| Number | 4 |
| Pages | 507–513 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1177/1461445612450375 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Acknowledging the perils of interdisciplinary and applied conversation analysis, this essay argues for clarity in articulating relationships between methods, addressing, in particular, the language used to formulate claims regarding how participants’ post hoc reflections relate to findings from CA analyses.
Notes
comment on Hansung et al, 2012
