Gibson2010
| Gibson2010 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Gibson2010 |
| Author(s) | David R. Gibson |
| Title | Marking the Turn: Obligation, Engagement, and Alienation in Group Discussions |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Turn-taking, Topic |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2010 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Social Psychology Quarterly |
| Volume | 73 |
| Number | 2 |
| Pages | 132-151 |
| URL | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272510371456 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
In group conversations, not speaking is the state of affairs experienced by most people most of the time; I refer to this as ‘‘conversational latency.’’ Hypothesizing that conversational latency affects one’s discursive options, I analyze the association between latency (operationalized as the number of turns that elapsed since the current speaker last spoke) and turn-initial words (e.g., but, oh) in twenty-nine experimental task groups, taking turn-initial words as indicators of the type of content a speaker proposes to produce. The findings suggest a model of group conversation in which conversational obligations weigh heaviest on the shoulders of the most recent contributors; those who contributed somewhat less recently remain engaged but have more latitude to take discordant positions; and those who have been quiet for longer periods are susceptible to ‘‘alienation from topic,’’ as a result of which reentry is often accompanied by an attempt to change the topic.
Notes
