Liberman2009
| Liberman2009 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Liberman2009 |
| Author(s) | Kenneth Liberman |
| Title | The Itinerary of Intersubjectivity in Social Phenomenological Research |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Intersubjectivity, Phenomenology, Ethnomethodology, Husserl, Garfinkel |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2009 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Schutzian Research. A Yearbook of Lifeworldly Phenomenology and Qualitative Social Science |
| Volume | 1 |
| Number | |
| Pages | 149164 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Abstract: Te struggles that alfred Schutz, aron Gurwitsch, harold Garfn- kel, and other social phenomenologists and ethnomethodologists have had with edmund husserl’s progenitive but inconsistent notion of intersubjectiv- ity are summarized and assessed. in particular, an account of Schutz’s objec- tions to intersubjective constitution is presented. Te commonly pervading elements and major diferences within this lineage of inquiry – a four gener- ation-long lineage of teacher and student that commences with husserl, runs through Schutz and Gurwitsch, then Garfnkel, and then the present author and his colleagues – are discussed, under the advisory (as suggested by Maurice natanson) that what husserl sought was more important than what he found.
Notes
