McHoul2008
Revision as of 15:48, 16 August 2017 by DarceySearles (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Alec McHoul; |Title=Questions of context in studies of talk and interaction: Ethnomethodology and conversation analysis |Tag(s)=EMCA; E...")
| McHoul2008 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | McHoul2008 |
| Author(s) | Alec McHoul |
| Title | Questions of context in studies of talk and interaction: Ethnomethodology and conversation analysis |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Ethnomethodology, Conversation Analysis, Context |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2008 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Journal of Pragmatics |
| Volume | 40 |
| Number | 5 |
| Pages | 823-826 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.10.009 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
The questions dealt with in this special issue of Journal of Pragmatics are doubly vexed. The first matter at issue is that the papers I have solicited take on some aspects of the debate within, and between, ethnomethodology (EM) and conversation analysis (CA) – and, by extension, wider approaches to discourse analysis and perhaps even pragmatics as a whole – as to whether and, if so to what extent, contextual particulars are relevant to the analyst’s task in hand; therefore specifying, to some degree, what that task actually is.
Notes
