Hutchby2001d
Revision as of 14:59, 9 December 2016 by DarceySearles (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Ian Hutchby; |Title=Technologies, texts and affordances |Tag(s)=EMCA; Technology; Affordances; Materiality; Realism; Social constructio...")
| Hutchby2001d | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Hutchby2001d |
| Author(s) | Ian Hutchby |
| Title | Technologies, texts and affordances |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Technology, Affordances, Materiality, Realism, Social constructionism |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2001 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Sociology |
| Volume | 35 |
| Number | |
| Pages | 441-456 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1177/S0038038501000219 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
In contrast to recent sociological emphases on the social shaping of technology, this article proposes and illustrates a way of analysing the technological shaping of sociality. Drawing on the concept of affordances (Gibson 1979), the article argues for a recognition of the constraining, as well as enabling, materiality of artefacts. The argument is set in the theoretical context of one of the most recent and comprehensive statements of anti-essentialism (Grint and Woolgar 1997). The position is illustrated through a reinterpretation of some case studies used by proponents of the radical constructivist position.
Notes
