OConnell-Kowal1994

From emcawiki
Revision as of 07:50, 29 December 2016 by PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Daniel C. O'Connell; Sabine Kowal; |Title=Some Current Transcription Systems For Spoken Discourse: A Critical Analysis |Tag(s)=EMCA...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
OConnell-Kowal1994
BibType ARTICLE
Key O'Connell-Kowal1994
Author(s) Daniel C. O'Connell, Sabine Kowal
Title Some Current Transcription Systems For Spoken Discourse: A Critical Analysis
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, IL, Transcription, Jefferson
Publisher
Year 1994
Language
City
Month
Journal Pragmatics
Volume 4
Number 1
Pages 81-107
URL
DOI
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

In recent decades, a rather disparate array of transcription systems, all alike intended to make the transient reality of spoken discourse accessible to the eyes of researchers, have found their way into the literature of several related fields of research, including linguistics, sociolinguistics, psycholinguistics, and ethnomethodology. Until recently, the usefulness and adequacy of these various transcription systems have been largely taken for granted, but in the past several years they have begun to attract attention to themselves as sources of research problems in their own right rather than as practical intermediate steps toward making data accessible. In the following, we first present the various criteria required by the authors of these systems if they are to be used effectively and adequately. We then review in detail the use of one specific sign for the notation of oral communicative behavior. For this review we have chosen the sign "h" (or, in some cases, "H") because in the various transcription systems, it is the one sign that happens to be used to represent in one way or another all four aspects of oral communicative behavior verbal, prosodic, paralinguistic, and extralinguistic (...). The primary use, however, is paralinguistic. In a third step we analyze various aspect of "h" in view of its usefulness and adequacy as a sign for the transcription of spoken discourse. And finally we derive conclusions from our review and analyse for the further development of transcription systems.

Notes