Jasperson-Hayashi-Fox1994

From emcawiki
Revision as of 00:40, 24 October 2019 by AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Jasperson-Hayashi-Fox1994
BibType ARTICLE
Key Jasperson-Hayashi-Fox1994
Author(s) Robert Jasperson, Makoto Hayashi, Barnara Fox
Title Semantics and interaction: three exploratory case studies
Editor(s)
Tag(s) IL, Semantics
Publisher
Year 1994
Language
City
Month
Journal Text
Volume 14
Number 4
Pages 555–580
URL Link
DOI 10.1515/text.1.1994.14.4.555
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

Conversation analytic studies in the area of interaction and grammar have indicated that the syntactic organization of talk is systematically subordinated to interactional pressures. The present study elaborates this finding by focussing on the relationship between semantics and interaction. We explore three instances from English and Japanese conversational data in which speakers displayed an orientation to conflict between the semantic integrity of their utterances and their larger interactional concerns. Three case studies investigate how speakers managed such conflict at the moment of utterance. In each case we found that the semantic integrity of an utterance was systematically subordinated to interactional concerns. speakers in some sense knowingly produced utterances which were factually incorrect or problematic in scope. The systematicity of the subordination has implications for the nature of the organization of meaning: our analysis strongly suggests that it is not the case that speakers form a mental representation of the meaning they want to communicate and then select the lexico-syntactic structures which will convey that meaning most accurately. Processes of grammaticalization, or 'semanticalization', are also implicated. Finally, we note how the experience of syntax as independent of semantics can be seen to arise when semantics is subordinated to interaction.

Notes