Difference between revisions of "Heritage2007a"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=John Heritage; Jeffrey D. Robinson; Marc N. Elliot; Megan Beckett; Michael Wilkes |Title=Reducing patients unmet concerns in primary car...")
(No difference)

Revision as of 08:27, 13 September 2016

Heritage2007a
BibType ARTICLE
Key Heritage2007a
Author(s) John Heritage, Jeffrey D. Robinson, Marc N. Elliot, Megan Beckett, Michael Wilkes
Title Reducing patients unmet concerns in primary care: The difference one word can make
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Medical EMCA, Doctor-patient interaction, Unmet Concerns
Publisher
Year 2007
Language
City
Month
Journal Journal of General Internal Medicine
Volume 22
Number 10
Pages 1429-1433
URL Link
DOI 10.1007/s11606-007-0279-0
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

Context

In primary, acute-care visits, patients frequently present with more than 1 concern. Various visit factors prevent additional concerns from being articulated and addressed.

Objective

To test an intervention to reduce patients’ unmet concerns.

Design

Cross-sectional comparison of 2 experimental questions, with videotaping of office visits and pre and postvisit surveys.

Setting

Twenty outpatient offices of community-based physicians equally divided between Los Angeles County and a midsized town in Pennsylvania.

Participants

A volunteer sample of 20 family physicians (participation rate = 80%) and 224 patients approached consecutively within physicians (participation rate = 73%; approximately 11 participating for each enrolled physician) seeking care for an acute condition.

Intervention

After seeing 4 nonintervention patients, physicians were randomly assigned to solicit additional concerns by asking 1 of the following 2 questions after patients presented their chief concern: “Is there anything else you want to address in the visit today?” (ANY condition) and “Is there something else you want to address in the visit today?” (SOME condition).

Main Outcome Measures

Patients’ unmet concerns: concerns listed on previsit surveys but not addressed during visits, visit time, unanticipated concerns: concerns that were addressed during the visit but not listed on previsit surveys.

Results

Relative to nonintervention cases, the implemented SOME intervention eliminated 78% of unmet concerns (odds ratio (OR) = .154, p = .001). The ANY intervention could not be significantly distinguished from the control condition (p = .122). Neither intervention affected visit length, or patients’; expression of unanticipated concerns not listed in previsit surveys.

Conclusions

Patients’ unmet concerns can be dramatically reduced by a simple inquiry framed in the SOME form. Both the learning and implementation of the intervention require very little time.

Notes