Difference between revisions of "Schegloff2000b"
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) m |
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Author(s)=Emanuel A. Schegloff; | |Author(s)=Emanuel A. Schegloff; | ||
|Title=When "Others" Initiate Repair | |Title=When "Others" Initiate Repair | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Other-initiated repair; |
|Key=Schegloff2000b | |Key=Schegloff2000b | ||
|Year=2000 | |Year=2000 | ||
Latest revision as of 06:11, 4 July 2016
| Schegloff2000b | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Schegloff2000b |
| Author(s) | Emanuel A. Schegloff |
| Title | When "Others" Initiate Repair |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Other-initiated repair |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2000 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Applied Linguistics |
| Volume | 21 |
| Number | 2 |
| Pages | 205–243 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1093/applin/21.2.205 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Early work on repair (Schegloff et al. 1977) had proposed that virtually all repair initiated by other than speaker of the trouble-source turn was initiated in the turn following the trouble-source turn. Such repair often came to be identified with this locus of initiation, being termed NTRI - an acronym derived from 'next turn repair initiation'. Subsequent work (Schegloff 1992) described another location in which 'other- initiated repair' is initiated-termed 'fourth position'. This paper revisits this issue and elaborates the locus of other-initiated repair. It reports on a number of environments in which 'others' initiate repair in turns later than the one directly following the trouble-source turn (without, however, occupying fourth position), and it describes several ways in which other- initiation of repair which occurs in next-turn position may be delayed within that position. These positionings of repair initiation in conversation among native speakers of English are briefly compared with a proposal by Wong that other-initiated repair by non-nativespeakers may regularly be delayed. A postscript suggests the prospect that studies of non-native speaker participation in talk-in-interaction be treated as not separable from the study of talk-in-interaction more generally.
Notes
