Difference between revisions of "Heritage2011a"
SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) (BibTeX auto import 2014-07-12 01:20:14) |
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
| + | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| + | |Author(s)=John Heritage; David Greatbatch; | ||
| + | |Title=Generating applause: A study of rhetoric and response at party political conferences | ||
| + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Rhetoric; Collective response; Political communication; Applause; | ||
|Key=Heritage2011a | |Key=Heritage2011a | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
|Year=1986 | |Year=1986 | ||
|Journal=American Journal of Sociology | |Journal=American Journal of Sociology | ||
| Line 12: | Line 11: | ||
|Pages=110–157 | |Pages=110–157 | ||
|URL=http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/2779719 | |URL=http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/2779719 | ||
| + | |Abstract=Recent work in conversation analysis suggests that audience re- | ||
| + | sponses to political speeches are strongly influenced by the rhetor- | ||
| + | ical construction of political messages. This paper shows that seven | ||
| + | basic rhetorical formats were associated with nearly 70% of the | ||
| + | applause produced in response to 476 political speeches to British | ||
| + | party political conferences in 1981. The relationship between | ||
| + | rhetoric and response is broadly independent of political party, the | ||
| + | political status of the speaker, and the popularity of the message. | ||
| + | Performance factors are found to influence the likelihood of audi- | ||
| + | ence response strongly. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 08:16, 24 June 2016
| Heritage2011a | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Heritage2011a |
| Author(s) | John Heritage, David Greatbatch |
| Title | Generating applause: A study of rhetoric and response at party political conferences |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Rhetoric, Collective response, Political communication, Applause |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 1986 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | American Journal of Sociology |
| Volume | 92 |
| Number | 1 |
| Pages | 110–157 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Recent work in conversation analysis suggests that audience re- sponses to political speeches are strongly influenced by the rhetor- ical construction of political messages. This paper shows that seven basic rhetorical formats were associated with nearly 70% of the applause produced in response to 476 political speeches to British party political conferences in 1981. The relationship between rhetoric and response is broadly independent of political party, the political status of the speaker, and the popularity of the message. Performance factors are found to influence the likelihood of audi- ence response strongly.
Notes
