Difference between revisions of "Barnes2016"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(BibTeX auto import 2016-04-29 02:13:05)
 
m
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{BibEntry
 
{{BibEntry
 +
|BibType=ARTICLE
 +
|Author(s)=Scott Barnes;
 +
|Title=Aphasia and Open Format Other-Initiation of Repair: Solving Complex Trouble in Conversation
 +
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Aphasia; Open class repair initiators;
 
|Key=Barnes2016
 
|Key=Barnes2016
|Key=Barnes2016
 
|Title=Aphasia and Open Format Other-Initiation of Repair: Solving Complex Trouble in Conversation
 
|Author(s)=Scott Barnes;
 
|Tag(s)=Needs review
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
 
|Year=2016
 
|Year=2016
 
|Journal=Research on Language and Social Interaction
 
|Journal=Research on Language and Social Interaction

Revision as of 03:21, 1 May 2016

Barnes2016
BibType ARTICLE
Key Barnes2016
Author(s) Scott Barnes
Title Aphasia and Open Format Other-Initiation of Repair: Solving Complex Trouble in Conversation
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Aphasia, Open class repair initiators
Publisher
Year 2016
Language
City
Month
Journal Research on Language and Social Interaction
Volume 49
Number 2
Pages 111-127
URL Link
DOI 10.1080/08351813.2016.1164399
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

If a listener uses a token like huh, what, sorry (an “open format other-initiation of repair”) to signal a problem in what the previous speaker has just said, it implies that it is the speaker who is responsible and that they should repair their own talk. But if the speaker is someone with aphasia, they may experience difficulty carrying out self-repair without support from their conversation partners. This article demonstrates how generating repair solutions to open format repair initiations can indeed be difficult for people with aphasia. It then explores how simplifying the design of the troublesome turn can reduce the linguistic burden on speakers with aphasia and involve conversation partners in resolving the trouble. This study adds to knowledge about the effects of aphasia on interaction, open formats, and the interface between action formation and turn design. Data are in Australian English.

Notes