Difference between revisions of "Day-Kjaerbeck2013"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Dennis Day; Susanne Kjaerbeck |Title=“Positioning” in the conversation analytic approach |Tag(s)=EMCA; |Key=Day-Kjaerbeck2013 |Year...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Author(s)=Dennis Day; Susanne Kjaerbeck | |Author(s)=Dennis Day; Susanne Kjaerbeck | ||
|Title=“Positioning” in the conversation analytic approach | |Title=“Positioning” in the conversation analytic approach | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; |
|Key=Day-Kjaerbeck2013 | |Key=Day-Kjaerbeck2013 | ||
|Year=2013 | |Year=2013 | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|Volume=23 | |Volume=23 | ||
|Number=1 | |Number=1 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=16–39 |
| + | |URL=http://www.jbe-platform.com/content/journals/10.1075/ni.23.1.02day | ||
| + | |DOI=10.1075/ni.23.1.02day | ||
| + | |Abstract=From the perspective of ethnomethodology and conversation analysis (EM/CA), the concept of positioning may offer a compellingly rich metaphor for understanding identity and relations. There appears, however, to be no such analytical concept in EM/CA. Instead, the EM/CA approach offers concepts such as alignment-affiliation, identities and membership categories — all of them based on actional resources on the micro-level of talk. The aim of this article is to inquire if EM/CA tools for the analysis of identities and relations in talk might be considered interesting from the perspective of positioning theory. To do so, we offer EM/CA analyses of narrative and non-narrative data in which the in situ negotiation of identities and relations plays a major role. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 06:00, 6 March 2016
| Day-Kjaerbeck2013 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Day-Kjaerbeck2013 |
| Author(s) | Dennis Day, Susanne Kjaerbeck |
| Title | “Positioning” in the conversation analytic approach |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2013 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Narrative Inquiry |
| Volume | 23 |
| Number | 1 |
| Pages | 16–39 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1075/ni.23.1.02day |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
From the perspective of ethnomethodology and conversation analysis (EM/CA), the concept of positioning may offer a compellingly rich metaphor for understanding identity and relations. There appears, however, to be no such analytical concept in EM/CA. Instead, the EM/CA approach offers concepts such as alignment-affiliation, identities and membership categories — all of them based on actional resources on the micro-level of talk. The aim of this article is to inquire if EM/CA tools for the analysis of identities and relations in talk might be considered interesting from the perspective of positioning theory. To do so, we offer EM/CA analyses of narrative and non-narrative data in which the in situ negotiation of identities and relations plays a major role.
Notes
