Difference between revisions of "MHGoodwin-Cekaite2013"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Marjorie Harness Goodwin; Asta Cekaite |Title=Calibration in directive/response sequences in family interaction |Tag(s)=EMCA; Family Con...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Author(s)=Marjorie Harness Goodwin; Asta Cekaite | |Author(s)=Marjorie Harness Goodwin; Asta Cekaite | ||
|Title=Calibration in directive/response sequences in family interaction | |Title=Calibration in directive/response sequences in family interaction | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Family Conversation; Directives; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Family Conversation; Directives; |
|Key=MHGoodwin-Cekaite2013 | |Key=MHGoodwin-Cekaite2013 | ||
|Year=2013 | |Year=2013 | ||
|Journal=Journal of Pragmatics | |Journal=Journal of Pragmatics | ||
|Volume=46 | |Volume=46 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Number=1 |
| + | |Pages=122–138 | ||
| + | |URL=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216612001877 | ||
| + | |DOI=10.1016/j.pragma.2012.07.008 | ||
| + | |Abstract=In the context of parent–child interaction we examine the syntactic, prosodic and embodied shape of directive response sequences used to launch, choreograph, monitor, and stall the ongoing progress of a routine communicative project (Linell, 1998) occurring across temporal and spatial dimensions. We explore directive/response usage in the goal-oriented routine activity (Weisner, 1998) of getting children ready for bed, a temporally anchored project that involves the movement of bodies through social space and transitions from one activity to another (Cekaite, 2010; M.H. 0155 and 0160). Dialogic and embodied characteristics of social action and accountability are demonstrated (1) through alternative grammatical formats for directives (declaratives, imperatives, interrogatives (formatted as noun phrases produced with rising intonation)) (2) as well as through the systematic ways in which participants overlay action within directive sequences with alternative forms of affect, touch, and mobility. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 13:19, 1 March 2016
| MHGoodwin-Cekaite2013 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | MHGoodwin-Cekaite2013 |
| Author(s) | Marjorie Harness Goodwin, Asta Cekaite |
| Title | Calibration in directive/response sequences in family interaction |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Family Conversation, Directives |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2013 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Journal of Pragmatics |
| Volume | 46 |
| Number | 1 |
| Pages | 122–138 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.07.008 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
In the context of parent–child interaction we examine the syntactic, prosodic and embodied shape of directive response sequences used to launch, choreograph, monitor, and stall the ongoing progress of a routine communicative project (Linell, 1998) occurring across temporal and spatial dimensions. We explore directive/response usage in the goal-oriented routine activity (Weisner, 1998) of getting children ready for bed, a temporally anchored project that involves the movement of bodies through social space and transitions from one activity to another (Cekaite, 2010; M.H. 0155 and 0160). Dialogic and embodied characteristics of social action and accountability are demonstrated (1) through alternative grammatical formats for directives (declaratives, imperatives, interrogatives (formatted as noun phrases produced with rising intonation)) (2) as well as through the systematic ways in which participants overlay action within directive sequences with alternative forms of affect, touch, and mobility.
Notes
