Difference between revisions of "Golato2012a"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Andrea Golato; |Title=German oh: marking an emotional change of state |Tag(s)=EMCA; Oh; German; |Key=Golato2012a |Year=2012 |Journal=R...")
 
m
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{BibEntry
 
{{BibEntry
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
|Author(s)=Andrea Golato;  
+
|Author(s)=Andrea Golato;
 
|Title=German oh: marking an emotional change of state
 
|Title=German oh: marking an emotional change of state
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Oh; German;  
+
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Oh; German;
 
|Key=Golato2012a
 
|Key=Golato2012a
 
|Year=2012
 
|Year=2012
Line 9: Line 9:
 
|Volume=45
 
|Volume=45
 
|Number=3
 
|Number=3
|Pages=245-268
+
|Pages=245–268
 +
|URL=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08351813.2012.699253
 +
|DOI=10.1080/08351813.2012.699253
 +
|Abstract=Working within a conversation analytic framework, this article analyzes the use and function of oh in conversational German and compares it to ach in German and oh in English. The analysis shows that both ach and oh are change-of-state tokens like English oh, but while ach is typically used for cognitive changes of state, oh is typically used to mark affective changes of state. The emotions communicated by oh are varied, and both the phonetic realization and the sequential placement of the token contribute to its meaning. The article discusses the implications of the findings for the study of emotions and cross-cultural comparisons of tokens.
 
}}
 
}}

Revision as of 04:01, 26 February 2016

Golato2012a
BibType ARTICLE
Key Golato2012a
Author(s) Andrea Golato
Title German oh: marking an emotional change of state
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Oh, German
Publisher
Year 2012
Language
City
Month
Journal Research on Language and Social Interaction
Volume 45
Number 3
Pages 245–268
URL Link
DOI 10.1080/08351813.2012.699253
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

Working within a conversation analytic framework, this article analyzes the use and function of oh in conversational German and compares it to ach in German and oh in English. The analysis shows that both ach and oh are change-of-state tokens like English oh, but while ach is typically used for cognitive changes of state, oh is typically used to mark affective changes of state. The emotions communicated by oh are varied, and both the phonetic realization and the sequential placement of the token contribute to its meaning. The article discusses the implications of the findings for the study of emotions and cross-cultural comparisons of tokens.

Notes