Difference between revisions of "Pasquandrea2011"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) m |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|Number=4 | |Number=4 | ||
|Pages=455–481 | |Pages=455–481 | ||
| − | |DOI=10 | + | |URL=http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=8368947 |
| − | |Abstract=Many studies (Heath 1984b, 1986; Robinson 1998; Robinson & Stivers | + | |DOI=10.1017/S0047404511000479 |
| − | 2001; Greatbach 2006; Frers 2009) have shown that, while interacting with | + | |Abstract=Many studies (Heath 1984b, 1986; Robinson 1998; Robinson & Stivers 2001; Greatbach 2006; Frers 2009) have shown that, while interacting with their patients, doctors fulfill several tasks (speaking, reading, writing prescriptions, reporting data on the computer, etc.) through an interplay of diverse multimodal resources (speech, gesture, body posture, gaze, object manipulation, etc.). In comparison, multimodality in interpreter-mediated medical encounters has received scant attention. This contribution examines a corpus of interactions involving Italian doctors, Chinese patients, and an interpreter. Having to manage multiparty and multitask conversations with patients with whom no direct communication is possible, doctors are forced to rely heavily on multimodality. The analysis here shows how the simultaneous actions performed by the doctors are coordinated through the use of multiple modalities. The outcomes on the global organization of interpreter-mediated interaction are also discussed. |
| − | their patients, doctors | ||
| − | |||
| − | diverse multimodal resources (speech, gesture, body posture, gaze, object | ||
| − | manipulation, etc.). In comparison, multimodality in interpreter-mediated | ||
| − | medical encounters has received scant attention. This contribution examines | ||
| − | a corpus of interactions involving Italian doctors, Chinese patients, and an | ||
| − | interpreter. Having to manage multiparty and multitask conversations with | ||
| − | patients with whom no direct communication is possible, doctors are | ||
| − | forced to rely heavily on multimodality. The analysis here shows how the | ||
| − | simultaneous actions performed by the doctors are coordinated through the | ||
| − | use of multiple modalities. The outcomes on the global organization of | ||
| − | interpreter-mediated interaction are also discussed. | ||
| − | |||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 12:11, 20 February 2016
| Pasquandrea2011 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Pasquandrea2011 |
| Author(s) | Sergio Pasquandrea |
| Title | Managing multiple actions through multimodality: Doctors’ involvement in interpreter-mediated interactions |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Conversation analysis, doctor-patient interaction, interpreting, multitasking, Multimodality |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2011 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Language in Society |
| Volume | 40 |
| Number | 4 |
| Pages | 455–481 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1017/S0047404511000479 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Many studies (Heath 1984b, 1986; Robinson 1998; Robinson & Stivers 2001; Greatbach 2006; Frers 2009) have shown that, while interacting with their patients, doctors fulfill several tasks (speaking, reading, writing prescriptions, reporting data on the computer, etc.) through an interplay of diverse multimodal resources (speech, gesture, body posture, gaze, object manipulation, etc.). In comparison, multimodality in interpreter-mediated medical encounters has received scant attention. This contribution examines a corpus of interactions involving Italian doctors, Chinese patients, and an interpreter. Having to manage multiparty and multitask conversations with patients with whom no direct communication is possible, doctors are forced to rely heavily on multimodality. The analysis here shows how the simultaneous actions performed by the doctors are coordinated through the use of multiple modalities. The outcomes on the global organization of interpreter-mediated interaction are also discussed.
Notes
