Difference between revisions of "Martin2012"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=David Martin; |Title=The cooperative use of material resources and contextual features in graphic design work |Tag(s)=EMCA; graphic de...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| − | |Author(s)=David Martin; | + | |Author(s)=David Martin; |
|Title=The cooperative use of material resources and contextual features in graphic design | |Title=The cooperative use of material resources and contextual features in graphic design | ||
work | work | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|Journal=Design Studies | |Journal=Design Studies | ||
|Volume=33 | |Volume=33 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Number=6 |
| − | |Abstract=We present an ethnomethodological analysis of an ethnographic study of graphic | + | |Pages=589–610 |
| − | designers to show how their design activities were organised. We focus on how | + | |URL=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142694X12000440 |
| − | the creative process is shaped through the instrumental and discursive use of | + | |DOI=10.1016/j.destud.2012.06.007 |
| − | material and digital resources. We concentrate on how contextually relevant but | + | |Abstract=We present an ethnomethodological analysis of an ethnographic study of graphic designers to show how their design activities were organised. We focus on how the creative process is shaped through the instrumental and discursive use of material and digital resources. We concentrate on how contextually relevant but ‘off-stage’ features of the design space such as clients, consumers, similar products, trends and so on are talked about in order to provide the context for understanding and assessing the potential quality and impact of the design. We also examine the situated use of aesthetic terms as a means through which the practitioners relate various features of the look and feel of the design to these elements of constructed context. |
| − | |||
| − | products, trends and so on are talked about in order to provide the context for | ||
| − | understanding and assessing the potential quality and impact of the design. We | ||
| − | also examine the situated use of aesthetic terms as a means through which the | ||
| − | practitioners relate various features of the look and feel of the design to these | ||
| − | elements of constructed context. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 05:03, 18 January 2016
| Martin2012 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Martin2012 |
| Author(s) | David Martin |
| Title | The cooperative use of material resources and contextual features in graphic design
work |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, graphic design, ethnomethodology, context, intent, aesthetics |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2012 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Design Studies |
| Volume | 33 |
| Number | 6 |
| Pages | 589–610 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.destud.2012.06.007 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
We present an ethnomethodological analysis of an ethnographic study of graphic designers to show how their design activities were organised. We focus on how the creative process is shaped through the instrumental and discursive use of material and digital resources. We concentrate on how contextually relevant but ‘off-stage’ features of the design space such as clients, consumers, similar products, trends and so on are talked about in order to provide the context for understanding and assessing the potential quality and impact of the design. We also examine the situated use of aesthetic terms as a means through which the practitioners relate various features of the look and feel of the design to these elements of constructed context.
Notes
