Difference between revisions of "Luck2012a"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Rachael Luck |Title=Kinds of seeing and spatial reasoning: Examining user participation at an architectural design event |Tag(s)=EMCA; u...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Author(s)=Rachael Luck | |Author(s)=Rachael Luck | ||
|Title=Kinds of seeing and spatial reasoning: Examining user participation at an architectural design event | |Title=Kinds of seeing and spatial reasoning: Examining user participation at an architectural design event | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; user participation; reasoning; architectural design; problem solving; Ethnomethodology; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; user participation; reasoning; architectural design; problem solving; Ethnomethodology; |
|Key=Luck2012a | |Key=Luck2012a | ||
|Year=2012 | |Year=2012 | ||
|Journal=Design Studies | |Journal=Design Studies | ||
|Volume=33 | |Volume=33 | ||
| + | |Number=6 | ||
|Pages=557-588 | |Pages=557-588 | ||
| − | |Abstract=The ways that we see and acknowledge design in the interactions between | + | |URL=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142694X12000397 |
| − | architects and resident users is examined, to recover the interactional practices | + | |DOI=10.1016/j.destud.2012.06.002 |
| − | through which mundane reasoning concerning the spatial properties of a housing | + | |Abstract=The ways that we see and acknowledge design in the interactions between architects and resident users is examined, to recover the interactional practices through which mundane reasoning concerning the spatial properties of a housing scheme were articulated and organised at a design event. Informed by ethnomethodological studies of mundane reasoning in sequential, practical actions, the residents’ formulation of a design problem and engagement in problem-solving demonstrate accomplished spatial reasoning skills. Their spatial reasoning was seen to be far from mundane. The ways that these actions were acknowledged as contributing to the design of the scheme were also remarkable. This study develops practical understanding of the ways we appreciate and in acknowledgements can facilitate active user-participation in design interactions. |
| − | scheme were articulated and organised at a design event. Informed by | ||
| − | ethnomethodological studies of mundane reasoning in sequential, practical | ||
| − | actions, the residents’ formulation of a design problem and engagement in | ||
| − | problem-solving demonstrate accomplished spatial reasoning skills. Their spatial | ||
| − | reasoning was seen to be far from mundane. The ways that these actions were | ||
| − | acknowledged as contributing to the design of the scheme were also remarkable. | ||
| − | This study develops practical understanding of the ways we appreciate and in | ||
| − | acknowledgements can facilitate active user-participation in design interactions. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 04:10, 16 January 2016
| Luck2012a | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Luck2012a |
| Author(s) | Rachael Luck |
| Title | Kinds of seeing and spatial reasoning: Examining user participation at an architectural design event |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, user participation, reasoning, architectural design, problem solving, Ethnomethodology |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2012 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Design Studies |
| Volume | 33 |
| Number | 6 |
| Pages | 557-588 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.destud.2012.06.002 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
The ways that we see and acknowledge design in the interactions between architects and resident users is examined, to recover the interactional practices through which mundane reasoning concerning the spatial properties of a housing scheme were articulated and organised at a design event. Informed by ethnomethodological studies of mundane reasoning in sequential, practical actions, the residents’ formulation of a design problem and engagement in problem-solving demonstrate accomplished spatial reasoning skills. Their spatial reasoning was seen to be far from mundane. The ways that these actions were acknowledged as contributing to the design of the scheme were also remarkable. This study develops practical understanding of the ways we appreciate and in acknowledgements can facilitate active user-participation in design interactions.
Notes
