Difference between revisions of "Response tokens"
SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) (→Bibliography database entries tagged with 'Response tokens') |
SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) (→Non-response) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Non-response == | == Non-response == | ||
| + | |||
| + | One sub-set of studies of response-tokens involves studies of their omission: response-tokens withheld in instances of 'non-response'. | ||
This list is based on responses to Isobel Ross' thread about withholding of response tokens [https://lists.aau.dk/pipermail/languse/Week-of-Mon-20151123/004805.html withholding of response tokens] on the [http://www.list.hum.aau.dk/pipermail/languse/ languse mailing list]. | This list is based on responses to Isobel Ross' thread about withholding of response tokens [https://lists.aau.dk/pipermail/languse/Week-of-Mon-20151123/004805.html withholding of response tokens] on the [http://www.list.hum.aau.dk/pipermail/languse/ languse mailing list]. | ||
Revision as of 06:51, 4 January 2016
Non-response
One sub-set of studies of response-tokens involves studies of their omission: response-tokens withheld in instances of 'non-response'.
This list is based on responses to Isobel Ross' thread about withholding of response tokens withholding of response tokens on the languse mailing list.
In that mail she asks: "I am looking for any research that specifically addresses the withholding of or lack of response tokens (such as continuers and acknowledgement tokens) in conversation (mundane or institutional)."
