Difference between revisions of "Zinken2015"
(BibTeX auto import 2015-04-15 05:25:21) |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 08:25, 15 April 2015
| Zinken2015 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Zinken2015 |
| Author(s) | Jörg Zinken |
| Title | Contingent control over shared goods. ‘Can I have x’ requests in British English informal interaction |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | In press, EMCA, Context, Home environment, Material objects, Multimodality, Requests, Timing |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2015 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Journal of Pragmatics |
| Volume | |
| Number | |
| Pages | |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.03.005 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
When formulating a request for an object, speakers can choose among different grammatical resources that would all serve the overall purpose. This paper examines the social contexts indexed and created by the choice of the turn format can I have x to request a shared good (the pepper grinder, a tissue from a box on the table, etc.) in British English informal interaction. The analysis is based on a video corpus of approximately 25 h of everyday interaction among family and friends. In its home environment, a request in the format can I have x treats the other as being in control over the relevant material object, a control that is the contingent outcome of ongoing courses of action. This contingent control over a shared good produces an obligation to make it available. This analysis is supported by an examination of similarly formatted request turns in other languages, of can I have x in another interactional environment (after a relevant offer has been made) in British English, and of deviant cases. The results highlight the intimate connection of request format selection to the present engagements of (prospective) request recipients.
Notes
