Difference between revisions of "Bloch2004"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Steven Bloch; Ray Wilkinson; |Title=The understandability of AAC: A conversation analysis study of acquired dysarthria |Tag(s)=EMCA; Co...")
 
(I know this isn't a clinical context, but I'm adding medical and disability tags because it seems relevant to that literature...)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{BibEntry
 
{{BibEntry
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
|Author(s)=Steven Bloch; Ray Wilkinson;  
+
|Author(s)=Steven Bloch; Ray Wilkinson;
 
|Title=The understandability of AAC: A conversation analysis study of acquired dysarthria
 
|Title=The understandability of AAC: A conversation analysis study of acquired dysarthria
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; Dysarthria; Augmentative and alternative communication; Understanding;  
+
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; Dysarthria; Augmentative and alternative communication; Understanding; Medical EMCA; Disabilities; 
 
|Key=Bloch2004
 
|Key=Bloch2004
 
|Year=2004
 
|Year=2004

Latest revision as of 23:47, 20 March 2015

Bloch2004
BibType ARTICLE
Key Bloch2004
Author(s) Steven Bloch, Ray Wilkinson
Title The understandability of AAC: A conversation analysis study of acquired dysarthria
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Conversation Analysis, Dysarthria, Augmentative and alternative communication, Understanding, Medical EMCA, Disabilities
Publisher
Year 2004
Language
City
Month
Journal Augmentative and Alternative Communication
Volume 20
Number 4
Pages 272-282
URL Link
DOI 10.1080/07434610400005614
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

In this paper, an analysis of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) system use by two adults with acquired dysarthria in conversation with their partners at home is presented. The qualitative methodology of Conversation Analysis (CA) is used to describe a particular type of AAC activity that was utilized during conversations by speakers with dysarthria for whom natural speech was still the primary modality. The two main findings were (a) that AAC was regularly used by speakers with dysarthria to attempt self-repairs of communication problems identified by their non-dysarthric partners; and (b) that AAC turns during self-repair activities were typically treated as intelligible but not fully understandable. It is suggested that CA can serve as a useful tool in dysarthria/AAC assessment and for the tailoring of AAC interventions to everyday conversational practices between people with dysarthria and their conversation partners.


Read More: http://informahealthcare.com/doi/abs/10.1080/07434610400005614

Notes