Difference between revisions of "Asmuss2002"
(BibTeX auto import 2025-03-06 03:28:23) |
m (fixes) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
| − | |Key= | + | |Key=Asmuss2002 |
| − | |||
|Title=Strukturelle Dissensmarkierungen in interkultureller Kommunikation | |Title=Strukturelle Dissensmarkierungen in interkultureller Kommunikation | ||
|Author(s)=Birte Asmuß; | |Author(s)=Birte Asmuß; | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; intercultural communication; German; Danish |
|ISBN=978-3-11-096088-4 | |ISBN=978-3-11-096088-4 | ||
|BibType=BOOK | |BibType=BOOK | ||
| Line 10: | Line 9: | ||
|Publisher=Max Niemeyer Verlag | |Publisher=Max Niemeyer Verlag | ||
|Number=452 | |Number=452 | ||
| − | | | + | |Year=2002 |
| − | |Note= | + | |DOI=10.1515/9783110960884 |
| + | |Note= | ||
|Abstract=The study shows that, contrary to received thinking on the point, intercultural communication is not necessarily problematic. Micro-analyses of authentic dissent sequences show that, despite their national, cultural, and linguistic differences, participants in German-Danish negotiations are capable of mastering even potentially problematic sequences. This points the necessity for a more differentiated approach to the field of intercultural communication if justice is to be done to the complexity of the subject. | |Abstract=The study shows that, contrary to received thinking on the point, intercultural communication is not necessarily problematic. Micro-analyses of authentic dissent sequences show that, despite their national, cultural, and linguistic differences, participants in German-Danish negotiations are capable of mastering even potentially problematic sequences. This points the necessity for a more differentiated approach to the field of intercultural communication if justice is to be done to the complexity of the subject. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 18:33, 9 March 2025
| Asmuss2002 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | BOOK |
| Key | Asmuss2002 |
| Author(s) | Birte Asmuß |
| Title | Strukturelle Dissensmarkierungen in interkultureller Kommunikation |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, intercultural communication, German, Danish |
| Publisher | Max Niemeyer Verlag |
| Year | 2002 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | |
| Volume | |
| Number | 452 |
| Pages | |
| URL | |
| DOI | 10.1515/9783110960884 |
| ISBN | 978-3-11-096088-4 |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | Linguistische Arbeiten |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
The study shows that, contrary to received thinking on the point, intercultural communication is not necessarily problematic. Micro-analyses of authentic dissent sequences show that, despite their national, cultural, and linguistic differences, participants in German-Danish negotiations are capable of mastering even potentially problematic sequences. This points the necessity for a more differentiated approach to the field of intercultural communication if justice is to be done to the complexity of the subject.
Notes
