Difference between revisions of "Procter2024"
JakubMlynar (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Rob Procter; Mark Rouncefield; Peter Tolmie; Clare Verrill |Title=Everyday Diagnostic Work in the Histopathology Lab: CSCW Perspectives...") |
JakubMlynar (talk | contribs) m (added a keyword) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Author(s)=Rob Procter; Mark Rouncefield; Peter Tolmie; Clare Verrill | |Author(s)=Rob Procter; Mark Rouncefield; Peter Tolmie; Clare Verrill | ||
|Title=Everyday Diagnostic Work in the Histopathology Lab: CSCW Perspectives on the Utilization of Data-Driven Clinical Decision Support Systems | |Title=Everyday Diagnostic Work in the Histopathology Lab: CSCW Perspectives on the Utilization of Data-Driven Clinical Decision Support Systems | ||
− | |Tag(s)=EMCA; In press; Clinical decision support system; Histopathology; Professional vision; Ethnography; Ethnomethodology | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; In press; Clinical decision support system; Histopathology; Professional vision; Ethnography; Ethnomethodology; AI Reference List |
|Key=Procter2024 | |Key=Procter2024 | ||
|Year=2024 | |Year=2024 |
Latest revision as of 00:49, 30 May 2024
Procter2024 | |
---|---|
BibType | ARTICLE |
Key | Procter2024 |
Author(s) | Rob Procter, Mark Rouncefield, Peter Tolmie, Clare Verrill |
Title | Everyday Diagnostic Work in the Histopathology Lab: CSCW Perspectives on the Utilization of Data-Driven Clinical Decision Support Systems |
Editor(s) | |
Tag(s) | EMCA, In press, Clinical decision support system, Histopathology, Professional vision, Ethnography, Ethnomethodology, AI Reference List |
Publisher | |
Year | 2024 |
Language | English |
City | |
Month | |
Journal | Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) |
Volume | |
Number | |
Pages | |
URL | Link |
DOI | 10.1007/s10606-024-09496-9 |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | |
Chapter |
Abstract
In this paper we present an ethnographic study of the work of histopathologists as they grapple with the twin innovations of transitioning to digital biopsy images and the prospective adoption of an AI-based clinical decision support system (CDSS). We explore how they are adapting to the former and their expectations of the latter. The study’s ethnomethodologically-informed ethnography approach brings to light some key issues regarding the nature of diagnostic work, and accountability and trust that are central to the successful adoption of technological innovations in clinical settings.
Notes