Difference between revisions of "Fele2024"
JakubMlynar (talk | contribs) |
JakubMlynar (talk | contribs) |
(No difference)
| |
Latest revision as of 08:03, 6 February 2024
| Fele2024 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Fele2024 |
| Author(s) | Giolo Fele, Gian Marco Campagnolo |
| Title | Seeing bad luck: player participation to tactical video analysis in amateur football |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Tactical video analysis, Ethnomethodology, Coaching |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2024 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Sports Coaching Review |
| Volume | 13 |
| Number | 1 |
| Pages | 60-87 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1080/21640629.2023.2275396 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This paper focuses on the skills involved in gaining insight from visual evidence in tactical video analysis. Using multimodal analysis of video recordings of tactical video analysis in a case from amateur football, our findings re-specify existing scholarship into video-based coaching by giving content to the idea of seeing as a scaffold for player engagement. We identify four methods in which participants use video data in interaction: the first involves using still images to give a label to the episode; the second is about making apparent what is seen on video through bodily re-enactment; the third entails zooming out from specific aspects of play to consider a larger spatial configuration while the fourth consists in considering the event within the extended temporal development of the action. Contrary to accounts of video-sessions whereby talk is dominated by the coach, the polyphony of voices and multiple ways of seeing captured by these methods concur to suggest a view of tactical video analysis as a complex social system of which the coach is but one member.
Notes
