Difference between revisions of "Rawls-Duck2017"
ElliottHoey (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Anne Warfield Rawls; Waverly Duck; |Title=“Fractured Reflections” of High-Status Black Male Presentations of Self: Nonrecognition of...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|Volume=50 | |Volume=50 | ||
|Number=1 | |Number=1 | ||
| + | |Pages=36–51 | ||
|URL=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00380237.2016.1218215 | |URL=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00380237.2016.1218215 | ||
| − | |DOI= | + | |DOI=10.1080/00380237.2016.1218215 |
|Abstract=This article examines the effects of “tacit” expectations about race, which are institutionalized in an Interaction Order that frames how we “see” high-status occupational identity. There is an essential moment in presenting Self before Other(s) when it is the turn of the Other(s) to recognize, respond to, and ratify that presentation. The Self is a social accomplishment that requires mutual cooperation from others. Failure to recognize and ratify competent presentations of self, reported frequently by black men, can strip those presentations of the social identity they claim and the dignity, power, and authority associated with that identity. We argue that these “tacit” expectations about identity follow black men wherever they go—no matter how successful they are. Using accounts drawn from interviews, we examine the persistent failure of Others to recognize and ratify high-status black male identities and the legitimate authority they carry. | |Abstract=This article examines the effects of “tacit” expectations about race, which are institutionalized in an Interaction Order that frames how we “see” high-status occupational identity. There is an essential moment in presenting Self before Other(s) when it is the turn of the Other(s) to recognize, respond to, and ratify that presentation. The Self is a social accomplishment that requires mutual cooperation from others. Failure to recognize and ratify competent presentations of self, reported frequently by black men, can strip those presentations of the social identity they claim and the dignity, power, and authority associated with that identity. We argue that these “tacit” expectations about identity follow black men wherever they go—no matter how successful they are. Using accounts drawn from interviews, we examine the persistent failure of Others to recognize and ratify high-status black male identities and the legitimate authority they carry. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 10:28, 28 December 2023
| Rawls-Duck2017 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Rawls-Duck2017 |
| Author(s) | Anne Warfield Rawls, Waverly Duck |
| Title | “Fractured Reflections” of High-Status Black Male Presentations of Self: Nonrecognition of Identity as a “Tacit” Form of Institutional Racism |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Racism, Race, Identity, Self-presentation, Institutions, Black, Power, Interviews, Authority |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2017 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Sociological Focus |
| Volume | 50 |
| Number | 1 |
| Pages | 36–51 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1080/00380237.2016.1218215 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This article examines the effects of “tacit” expectations about race, which are institutionalized in an Interaction Order that frames how we “see” high-status occupational identity. There is an essential moment in presenting Self before Other(s) when it is the turn of the Other(s) to recognize, respond to, and ratify that presentation. The Self is a social accomplishment that requires mutual cooperation from others. Failure to recognize and ratify competent presentations of self, reported frequently by black men, can strip those presentations of the social identity they claim and the dignity, power, and authority associated with that identity. We argue that these “tacit” expectations about identity follow black men wherever they go—no matter how successful they are. Using accounts drawn from interviews, we examine the persistent failure of Others to recognize and ratify high-status black male identities and the legitimate authority they carry.
Notes
