Difference between revisions of "Hepburn2023"
JakubMlynar (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Alexa Hepburn; Jonathan Potter; Marissa Caldwell; |Title=The Visible Politics of Intersubjectivity: Constructing Knowledge as Shared to...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Author(s)=Alexa Hepburn; Jonathan Potter; Marissa Caldwell; | |Author(s)=Alexa Hepburn; Jonathan Potter; Marissa Caldwell; | ||
|Title=The Visible Politics of Intersubjectivity: Constructing Knowledge as Shared to Manage Resistance in News Interviews | |Title=The Visible Politics of Intersubjectivity: Constructing Knowledge as Shared to Manage Resistance in News Interviews | ||
− | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Resistance; News interviews; Tag questions; Intersubjectivity; Interknowledgeability; Conversation analysis | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Resistance; News interviews; Tag questions; Intersubjectivity; Interknowledgeability; Conversation analysis |
|Key=Hepburn2023 | |Key=Hepburn2023 | ||
|Year=2023 | |Year=2023 | ||
|Language=English | |Language=English | ||
|Journal=Journal of Language and Social Psychology | |Journal=Journal of Language and Social Psychology | ||
+ | |Volume=42 | ||
+ | |Number=5-6 | ||
+ | |Pages=544-564 | ||
|URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0261927X231186211 | |URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0261927X231186211 | ||
|DOI=10.1177/0261927X231186211 | |DOI=10.1177/0261927X231186211 | ||
|Abstract=This paper describes one practice of “resistance” to challenging interviewees in television news interviews. Interviewers use turn medial tags when working with field reporters to display shared knowledge to an overhearing audience. In contrast, analysis focuses on examples in which tag questions are issued midturn, e.g., “You put your finger on the button didn’t you.=when you said …”. In this practice knowledge and understanding are built as shared in the face of resistance from high-status and highly experienced interviewees. The syntactic reorganization of different elements within individual turns, combined with the possibility of manipulating the sequential positioning of an utterance, allow intersubjectivity to be invasively and coercively re/built through displays of mis/alignment across turns and sequences of talk. We explore the implications of this for how resistance can be understood. Our analysis also contributes to a politics of intersubjectivity and, more specifically, interknowledgeability. | |Abstract=This paper describes one practice of “resistance” to challenging interviewees in television news interviews. Interviewers use turn medial tags when working with field reporters to display shared knowledge to an overhearing audience. In contrast, analysis focuses on examples in which tag questions are issued midturn, e.g., “You put your finger on the button didn’t you.=when you said …”. In this practice knowledge and understanding are built as shared in the face of resistance from high-status and highly experienced interviewees. The syntactic reorganization of different elements within individual turns, combined with the possibility of manipulating the sequential positioning of an utterance, allow intersubjectivity to be invasively and coercively re/built through displays of mis/alignment across turns and sequences of talk. We explore the implications of this for how resistance can be understood. Our analysis also contributes to a politics of intersubjectivity and, more specifically, interknowledgeability. | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 00:59, 17 October 2023
Hepburn2023 | |
---|---|
BibType | ARTICLE |
Key | Hepburn2023 |
Author(s) | Alexa Hepburn, Jonathan Potter, Marissa Caldwell |
Title | The Visible Politics of Intersubjectivity: Constructing Knowledge as Shared to Manage Resistance in News Interviews |
Editor(s) | |
Tag(s) | EMCA, Resistance, News interviews, Tag questions, Intersubjectivity, Interknowledgeability, Conversation analysis |
Publisher | |
Year | 2023 |
Language | English |
City | |
Month | |
Journal | Journal of Language and Social Psychology |
Volume | 42 |
Number | 5-6 |
Pages | 544-564 |
URL | Link |
DOI | 10.1177/0261927X231186211 |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | |
Chapter |
Abstract
This paper describes one practice of “resistance” to challenging interviewees in television news interviews. Interviewers use turn medial tags when working with field reporters to display shared knowledge to an overhearing audience. In contrast, analysis focuses on examples in which tag questions are issued midturn, e.g., “You put your finger on the button didn’t you.=when you said …”. In this practice knowledge and understanding are built as shared in the face of resistance from high-status and highly experienced interviewees. The syntactic reorganization of different elements within individual turns, combined with the possibility of manipulating the sequential positioning of an utterance, allow intersubjectivity to be invasively and coercively re/built through displays of mis/alignment across turns and sequences of talk. We explore the implications of this for how resistance can be understood. Our analysis also contributes to a politics of intersubjectivity and, more specifically, interknowledgeability.
Notes