Difference between revisions of "Bolden2017"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) m |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|Language=English | |Language=English | ||
|Address=Amsterdam / Philadelphia | |Address=Amsterdam / Philadelphia | ||
| − | |Booktitle=Enabling Human Conduct: Studies of | + | |Booktitle=Enabling Human Conduct: Studies of Talk-in-Interaction in Honor of Emanuel A. Schegloff |
|Pages=231–272 | |Pages=231–272 | ||
| + | |URL=https://benjamins.com/catalog/pbns.273.13bol | ||
|DOI=10.1075/pbns.273.13bol | |DOI=10.1075/pbns.273.13bol | ||
|Abstract=Taking its inspiration in “Opening Up Closings” by Schegloff and Sacks (1973), the chapter investigates how the activity of closing a conversation is initiated in Russian telephone conversations. Two distinct practices for initiating closings – tacit and explicit closings initiations – are examined, in terms of their lexical and prosodic composition and their position. Conversation closings may be launched tacitly when a closing implicative environment has been established. Prosody plays an important role both in establishing a closing-implicative environment and in accomplishing a move into closings. Closings may also be initiated explicitly (via a request or offer to end the conversation) when a closing-relevant environment has not been established or in order to accomplish additional relationship-reaffirming work. | |Abstract=Taking its inspiration in “Opening Up Closings” by Schegloff and Sacks (1973), the chapter investigates how the activity of closing a conversation is initiated in Russian telephone conversations. Two distinct practices for initiating closings – tacit and explicit closings initiations – are examined, in terms of their lexical and prosodic composition and their position. Conversation closings may be launched tacitly when a closing implicative environment has been established. Prosody plays an important role both in establishing a closing-implicative environment and in accomplishing a move into closings. Closings may also be initiated explicitly (via a request or offer to end the conversation) when a closing-relevant environment has not been established or in order to accomplish additional relationship-reaffirming work. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 03:35, 26 September 2023
| Bolden2017 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | INCOLLECTION |
| Key | Bolden2017 |
| Author(s) | Galina B. Bolden |
| Title | Opening up closings in Russian |
| Editor(s) | Geoffrey Raymond, Gene H. Lerner, John Heritage |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Russian, conversation closings, overall structural organization, prosody, conversation analysis |
| Publisher | John Benjamins Publishing |
| Year | 2017 |
| Language | English |
| City | Amsterdam / Philadelphia |
| Month | |
| Journal | |
| Volume | |
| Number | |
| Pages | 231–272 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1075/pbns.273.13bol |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | Enabling Human Conduct: Studies of Talk-in-Interaction in Honor of Emanuel A. Schegloff |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Taking its inspiration in “Opening Up Closings” by Schegloff and Sacks (1973), the chapter investigates how the activity of closing a conversation is initiated in Russian telephone conversations. Two distinct practices for initiating closings – tacit and explicit closings initiations – are examined, in terms of their lexical and prosodic composition and their position. Conversation closings may be launched tacitly when a closing implicative environment has been established. Prosody plays an important role both in establishing a closing-implicative environment and in accomplishing a move into closings. Closings may also be initiated explicitly (via a request or offer to end the conversation) when a closing-relevant environment has not been established or in order to accomplish additional relationship-reaffirming work.
Notes
