Difference between revisions of "Helmer2022"
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=INCOLLECTION |Author(s)=Henrike Helmer |Title=Strategy Ascriptions in Public Mediation Talks |Editor(s)=Arnulf Deppermann; Michael Haugh |Tag(s)=EMCA; Publ...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
|Booktitle=Action Ascription in Social Interaction | |Booktitle=Action Ascription in Social Interaction | ||
|Pages=160–182 | |Pages=160–182 | ||
| + | |URL=https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/action-ascription-in-interaction/strategy-ascriptions-in-public-mediation-talks/DB644D26FF12FB4384465902FC1E76F5 | ||
| + | |DOI=10.1017/9781108673419.009 | ||
| + | |Abstract=Action ascription is an emergent process of mutual displays of understanding. Usually, the kind of action that is ascribed to a prior turn by a next action remains implicit. Sometimes, however, actions are overtly ascribed, for example, when speakers expose the use of strategies. This happens particularly in conflictual interaction, such as public debates or mediation talks. In these interactional settings, one of the speakers’ goals is to discredit their opponents in front of other participants or an overhearing audience. This chapter investigates different types of overt strategy ascriptions in a public mediation: exposing the opponent’s use of rhetorical devices, exposing the opponent’s use of false premises, and exposing that an opponent is telling only a half-truth. This chapter shows how speakers use ascriptions of acting strategically as accusations to disclose their opponents’ intentions and ‘truths’ that the opponents allegedly conceal and that are detrimental to their position. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 00:47, 6 August 2023
| Helmer2022 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | INCOLLECTION |
| Key | Helmer2022 |
| Author(s) | Henrike Helmer |
| Title | Strategy Ascriptions in Public Mediation Talks |
| Editor(s) | Arnulf Deppermann, Michael Haugh |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Public Mediation, Strategy Ascriptions |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| Year | 2022 |
| Language | English |
| City | Cambridge |
| Month | |
| Journal | |
| Volume | |
| Number | |
| Pages | 160–182 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1017/9781108673419.009 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | Action Ascription in Social Interaction |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Action ascription is an emergent process of mutual displays of understanding. Usually, the kind of action that is ascribed to a prior turn by a next action remains implicit. Sometimes, however, actions are overtly ascribed, for example, when speakers expose the use of strategies. This happens particularly in conflictual interaction, such as public debates or mediation talks. In these interactional settings, one of the speakers’ goals is to discredit their opponents in front of other participants or an overhearing audience. This chapter investigates different types of overt strategy ascriptions in a public mediation: exposing the opponent’s use of rhetorical devices, exposing the opponent’s use of false premises, and exposing that an opponent is telling only a half-truth. This chapter shows how speakers use ascriptions of acting strategically as accusations to disclose their opponents’ intentions and ‘truths’ that the opponents allegedly conceal and that are detrimental to their position.
Notes
