Difference between revisions of "PekarekDoehler2022a"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Simona Pekarek Doehler; Leelo Keevallik; Xiaoting Li; |Title=Editorial: The Grammar-Body Interface in Social Interaction |Tag(s)=EMCA; m...")
 
 
Line 9: Line 9:
 
|Language=English
 
|Language=English
 
|Journal=Frontiers in Communication
 
|Journal=Frontiers in Communication
 +
|URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.875696/full
 
|DOI=https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.875696
 
|DOI=https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.875696
 
|Abstract=Human communication rests on a complex ecology of multiple resources that are orchestrated for collaborative meaning-making and coordination of social action. The aim of this Research Topic is to analyze how grammar and the body interface in naturally occurring interaction. The contributions draw on conversation analysis and interactional linguistics to demonstrate how verbal and bodily conduct is intricately intertwined: they mutually elaborate each other and are variably synchronized to achieve communicative goals. A distinctive feature of the studies is that they offer collection-based analyses of a range of grammar-body assemblies: recurrent simultaneous or successive combinations of grammatical constructions and bodily behavior. Taken together, they offer a rich demonstration of how analyzing language use in its full local ecology has the potential of deepening, if not revising, our very understanding of language. In this editorial, we will organize the studies into four sections as described below.
 
|Abstract=Human communication rests on a complex ecology of multiple resources that are orchestrated for collaborative meaning-making and coordination of social action. The aim of this Research Topic is to analyze how grammar and the body interface in naturally occurring interaction. The contributions draw on conversation analysis and interactional linguistics to demonstrate how verbal and bodily conduct is intricately intertwined: they mutually elaborate each other and are variably synchronized to achieve communicative goals. A distinctive feature of the studies is that they offer collection-based analyses of a range of grammar-body assemblies: recurrent simultaneous or successive combinations of grammatical constructions and bodily behavior. Taken together, they offer a rich demonstration of how analyzing language use in its full local ecology has the potential of deepening, if not revising, our very understanding of language. In this editorial, we will organize the studies into four sections as described below.
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 20:12, 29 December 2022

PekarekDoehler2022a
BibType ARTICLE
Key PekarekDoehler2022a
Author(s) Simona Pekarek Doehler, Leelo Keevallik, Xiaoting Li
Title Editorial: The Grammar-Body Interface in Social Interaction
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, multimodality, Grammar in interaction, Interactional Linguistics, Gesture, Gaze, Posture
Publisher Frontiers
Year 2022
Language English
City
Month
Journal Frontiers in Communication
Volume
Number
Pages
URL Link
DOI https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.875696
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

Human communication rests on a complex ecology of multiple resources that are orchestrated for collaborative meaning-making and coordination of social action. The aim of this Research Topic is to analyze how grammar and the body interface in naturally occurring interaction. The contributions draw on conversation analysis and interactional linguistics to demonstrate how verbal and bodily conduct is intricately intertwined: they mutually elaborate each other and are variably synchronized to achieve communicative goals. A distinctive feature of the studies is that they offer collection-based analyses of a range of grammar-body assemblies: recurrent simultaneous or successive combinations of grammatical constructions and bodily behavior. Taken together, they offer a rich demonstration of how analyzing language use in its full local ecology has the potential of deepening, if not revising, our very understanding of language. In this editorial, we will organize the studies into four sections as described below.

Notes