Difference between revisions of "Livingston2008a"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m
 
Line 2: Line 2:
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|Author(s)=Eric Livingston;
 
|Author(s)=Eric Livingston;
|Title=Context and details in studies of the witnessable social order: Puzzles, maps, checkers, and geometry
+
|Title=Context and detail in studies of the witnessable social order: Puzzles, maps, checkers, and geometry
 
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Ethnomethodology; Context; Research Methods; Thematics; Reasoning
 
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Ethnomethodology; Context; Research Methods; Thematics; Reasoning
 
|Key=Livingston2008a
 
|Key=Livingston2008a

Latest revision as of 23:07, 1 November 2022

Livingston2008a
BibType ARTICLE
Key Livingston2008a
Author(s) Eric Livingston
Title Context and detail in studies of the witnessable social order: Puzzles, maps, checkers, and geometry
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Ethnomethodology, Context, Research Methods, Thematics, Reasoning
Publisher
Year 2008
Language
City
Month
Journal Journal of Pragmatics
Volume 40
Number 5
Pages 840–862
URL Link
DOI 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.09.009
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

“Context” is typically treated as a resource for the analysis of interactional settings. In this paper, the specification and characterization of context itself, in and as situated action and reasoning, are seen as a focal point of research. The paper is framed by practical and theoretical problems currently facing ethnomethodology. It then discusses organizational thematics, situated analytics, and new research directions, particularly in the study of natural logics endemic to domains of expertise. The methodological and substantive findings of the paper are summarized in terms of the development of new sociologies of a witnessable, as opposed to a hidden, social order.

Notes