Difference between revisions of "Bolden2010"
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) m |
SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Author(s)=Galina B. Bolden; | |Author(s)=Galina B. Bolden; | ||
|Title=“Articulating the unsaid” via and-prefaced formulations of others’ talk | |Title=“Articulating the unsaid” via and-prefaced formulations of others’ talk | ||
− | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; Affiliation; Confirmation requests; Discourse Markers; Formulations; Repair; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; Affiliation; Confirmation requests; Discourse Markers; Formulations; Repair; Allusion |
|Key=Bolden2010 | |Key=Bolden2010 | ||
|Year=2010 | |Year=2010 |
Latest revision as of 08:08, 24 August 2022
Bolden2010 | |
---|---|
BibType | ARTICLE |
Key | Bolden2010 |
Author(s) | Galina B. Bolden |
Title | “Articulating the unsaid” via and-prefaced formulations of others’ talk |
Editor(s) | |
Tag(s) | EMCA, Conversation Analysis, Affiliation, Confirmation requests, Discourse Markers, Formulations, Repair, Allusion |
Publisher | |
Year | 2010 |
Language | |
City | |
Month | |
Journal | Discourse Studies |
Volume | 12 |
Number | 1 |
Pages | 5–32 |
URL | Link |
DOI | 10.1177/1461445609346770 |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | |
Chapter |
Abstract
This article provides a conversation analytic description of a previously unstudied conversational action: ‘articulating the unsaid’ via and-prefaced formulations of other people’s talk. Contributing to the extant research on formulations and on interactional functions of discourse markers, the article shows that and-prefaced formulations accomplish a distinct conversational action that has the following features: these formulations are assertions about the addressee’s domain of knowledge that perform a repair operation in the form of a request for confirmation; they articulate a ‘missing’ element of the addressee’s preceding talk (which is, typically, an extended informing turn); what is being formulated is claimably inferable from the prior talk; moreover, such formulations extend the addressee’s course of action on his/her behalf. The article describes compositional and sequential features of and-prefaced formulations and how they shape interactional trajectories of in-progress courses of action.
Notes