Difference between revisions of "McHoul1981"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Alex McHoul; |Title=Ethnomethodology and the position of relativist discourse |Tag(s)=EMCA; Ethnomethodology; |Key=McHoul1981 |Year=19...") |
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| − | |Author(s)=Alex McHoul; | + | |Author(s)=Alex McHoul; |
|Title=Ethnomethodology and the position of relativist discourse | |Title=Ethnomethodology and the position of relativist discourse | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Ethnomethodology; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Ethnomethodology; |
|Key=McHoul1981 | |Key=McHoul1981 | ||
|Year=1981 | |Year=1981 | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|Number=2 | |Number=2 | ||
|Pages=107–124 | |Pages=107–124 | ||
| + | |Abstract=The paper works through the topic of ‘theorising’ as it has been treated in ethnomethodology. It is concerned to show (a) that the topic has a somewhat equivocal status within that discourse; (b) that some recent self-critical moves in ethnomethodology which have been touched off by considering these problems constitute no more than further uncritical repetitions of that discourse; (c) that ethnomethodology’s critics have been concentrating unnecessarily upon its supposed ‘idealism’ and have missed a central trouble: that ethnomethodology is an overly realist form of social scientific work. | ||
| + | |||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 06:07, 2 December 2014
| McHoul1981 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | McHoul1981 |
| Author(s) | Alex McHoul |
| Title | Ethnomethodology and the position of relativist discourse |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Ethnomethodology |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 1981 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour |
| Volume | 11 |
| Number | 2 |
| Pages | 107–124 |
| URL | |
| DOI | |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
The paper works through the topic of ‘theorising’ as it has been treated in ethnomethodology. It is concerned to show (a) that the topic has a somewhat equivocal status within that discourse; (b) that some recent self-critical moves in ethnomethodology which have been touched off by considering these problems constitute no more than further uncritical repetitions of that discourse; (c) that ethnomethodology’s critics have been concentrating unnecessarily upon its supposed ‘idealism’ and have missed a central trouble: that ethnomethodology is an overly realist form of social scientific work.
Notes
