Difference between revisions of "Auer2021"
BogdanaHuma (talk | contribs) (BibTeX auto import 2021-03-11 08:34:00) |
BogdanaHuma (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|Title=Turn-allocation and gaze: A multimodal revision of the “current-speaker-selects-next” rule of the turn-taking system of conversation analysis | |Title=Turn-allocation and gaze: A multimodal revision of the “current-speaker-selects-next” rule of the turn-taking system of conversation analysis | ||
|Author(s)=Peter Auer; | |Author(s)=Peter Auer; | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Turn-taking; Gaze; Next-speaker selection; Simultaneous starts; Multi-party interaction; Eye-tracking; German |
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
|Year=2021 | |Year=2021 | ||
Latest revision as of 13:43, 11 March 2021
| Auer2021 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Auer2021 |
| Author(s) | Peter Auer |
| Title | Turn-allocation and gaze: A multimodal revision of the “current-speaker-selects-next” rule of the turn-taking system of conversation analysis |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Turn-taking, Gaze, Next-speaker selection, Simultaneous starts, Multi-party interaction, Eye-tracking, German |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2021 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Discourse Studies |
| Volume | 23 |
| Number | 2 |
| Pages | 117-140 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1177/1461445620966922 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
It is argued in this paper that a multimodal analysis of turn-taking, one of the core areas of conversation analytic research, is needed and has to integrate gaze as one of the most central resources for allocating turns, and that new technologies are available that can provide a solid and reliable empirical foundation for this analysis. On the basis of eye-tracking data of spontaneous conversations, it is shown that gaze is the most ubiquitous next-speaker-selection technique. It can function alone or enhance other techniques. I also discuss the interrelationship between the strength for sequential projection and the choice of next-speaker-selection techniques by a current speaker. The appropriate consideration of gaze leads to a revision of the turn-taking model in that it reduces the domain of self-selection and expands that of the current-speaker-selects-next sub-rule. It also has consequences for the analysis of “simultaneous starts”.
Notes
