Difference between revisions of "Sormani2020"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Philippe Sormani; |Title=‘DIY AI’? Practising kit assembly, locating critical inquiry |Tag(s)=EMCA; Artificial intelligence |Key=Sor...")
 
 
Line 3: Line 3:
 
|Author(s)=Philippe Sormani;
 
|Author(s)=Philippe Sormani;
 
|Title=‘DIY AI’? Practising kit assembly, locating critical inquiry
 
|Title=‘DIY AI’? Practising kit assembly, locating critical inquiry
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Artificial intelligence
+
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Artificial intelligence; AI reference list
 
|Key=Sormani2020
 
|Key=Sormani2020
 
|Year=2020
 
|Year=2020

Latest revision as of 00:10, 24 February 2021

Sormani2020
BibType ARTICLE
Key Sormani2020
Author(s) Philippe Sormani
Title ‘DIY AI’? Practising kit assembly, locating critical inquiry
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Artificial intelligence, AI reference list
Publisher
Year 2020
Language English
City
Month
Journal Ethnographic Studies
Volume
Number 17
Pages 60-80
URL Link
DOI 10.5281/zenodo.4050539
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

This paper presents a reflexive ethnography of ‘DIY AI’ underway. Part 1 examines a promotional video of Google’s ‘AIY Vision Kit’, its ‘do-it-yourself intelligent camera’, running on a Raspberry Pi computer and fitting into an 4.7´7.5´7.6 cm cardboard box. Part 2 of the paper, in turn, reports on our initial effort at kit assembly with the help of the user manual. In particular, I shall home in on our ‘turn it on’ attempt, as a first ‘step condition’ to operate the assembled kit ‘intelligently’—that is, for ‘experiment[ing] with image recognition using neural networks’ (Google 2018). The reflexive ethnography pursues two aims. First, it shall make explicit (some of) the ‘vulgar enabling practices’ (Button and Sharrock 1995) of the probed ‘intelligent camera’. Second, the ethnography will revisit the interplay between ‘technical work and critical inquiry’ (Lynch 1982) by locating how, when, and why the former invited the latter in situ. Recent reflection on critical inquiry in and across STS (e.g., Mirowski 2020), algorithm studies (e.g., Mackenzie 2017), and social and cultural studies more broadly (e.g., Tsilipakos 2018), will be practically indexed and recast accordingly. So will critical inquiry in matters of ‘DIY (AI)’ more specifically.

Notes