Difference between revisions of "Fischer2019"
StuartReeves (talk | contribs) (BibTeX auto import 2020-12-23 11:00:16) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
| + | |BibType=INPROCEEDINGS | ||
| + | |Author(s)=Joel E. Fischer; Stuart Reeves; Martin Porcheron; Rein Sikveland | ||
| + | |Title=Progressivity for Voice Interface Design | ||
| + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; VUI; conversation analysis; design; speech; voice; AI reference list | ||
|Key=Fischer2019 | |Key=Fischer2019 | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
|Publisher=ACM | |Publisher=ACM | ||
| + | |Year=2019 | ||
|Address=New York, NY, USA | |Address=New York, NY, USA | ||
| − | |||
|Month=August | |Month=August | ||
| + | |Booktitle=Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Conversational User Interfaces | ||
|Pages=26:1–26:8 | |Pages=26:1–26:8 | ||
|URL=http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/3342775.3342788 | |URL=http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/3342775.3342788 | ||
|DOI=10.1145/3342775.3342788 | |DOI=10.1145/3342775.3342788 | ||
| + | |ISBN=978-1-4503-7187-2 | ||
| + | |Series=CUI '19 | ||
|Note=\emph\textbfWinner of Best Paper Award | |Note=\emph\textbfWinner of Best Paper Award | ||
|Abstract=Drawing from Conversation Analysis (CA), we examine how the orientation towards progressivity in talk-keeping things moving-might help us better understand and design for voice interactions. We introduce progressivity by surveying its explication in CA, and then look at how a strong preference for progressivity in conversation works out practically in sequences of voice interaction recorded in people's homes. Following Stivers and Robinson's work on progressivity, we find our data shows: how non-answer responses impede progress; how accounts offered for non-answer responses can lead to recovery; how participants work to receive answers; and how, ultimately, moving the interaction forwards does not necessarily involve a fitted answer, but other kinds of responses as well. We discuss the wider potential of applying progressivity to evaluate and understand voice interactions, and consider what designers of voice experiences might do to design for progressivity. Our contribution is a demonstration of the progressivity principle and its interactional features, which also points towards the need for specific kinds of future developments in speech technology. | |Abstract=Drawing from Conversation Analysis (CA), we examine how the orientation towards progressivity in talk-keeping things moving-might help us better understand and design for voice interactions. We introduce progressivity by surveying its explication in CA, and then look at how a strong preference for progressivity in conversation works out practically in sequences of voice interaction recorded in people's homes. Following Stivers and Robinson's work on progressivity, we find our data shows: how non-answer responses impede progress; how accounts offered for non-answer responses can lead to recovery; how participants work to receive answers; and how, ultimately, moving the interaction forwards does not necessarily involve a fitted answer, but other kinds of responses as well. We discuss the wider potential of applying progressivity to evaluate and understand voice interactions, and consider what designers of voice experiences might do to design for progressivity. Our contribution is a demonstration of the progressivity principle and its interactional features, which also points towards the need for specific kinds of future developments in speech technology. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 23:49, 23 February 2021
| Fischer2019 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | INPROCEEDINGS |
| Key | Fischer2019 |
| Author(s) | Joel E. Fischer, Stuart Reeves, Martin Porcheron, Rein Sikveland |
| Title | Progressivity for Voice Interface Design |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, VUI, conversation analysis, design, speech, voice, AI reference list |
| Publisher | ACM |
| Year | 2019 |
| Language | |
| City | New York, NY, USA |
| Month | August |
| Journal | |
| Volume | |
| Number | |
| Pages | 26:1–26:8 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1145/3342775.3342788 |
| ISBN | 978-1-4503-7187-2 |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | CUI '19 |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Conversational User Interfaces |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Drawing from Conversation Analysis (CA), we examine how the orientation towards progressivity in talk-keeping things moving-might help us better understand and design for voice interactions. We introduce progressivity by surveying its explication in CA, and then look at how a strong preference for progressivity in conversation works out practically in sequences of voice interaction recorded in people's homes. Following Stivers and Robinson's work on progressivity, we find our data shows: how non-answer responses impede progress; how accounts offered for non-answer responses can lead to recovery; how participants work to receive answers; and how, ultimately, moving the interaction forwards does not necessarily involve a fitted answer, but other kinds of responses as well. We discuss the wider potential of applying progressivity to evaluate and understand voice interactions, and consider what designers of voice experiences might do to design for progressivity. Our contribution is a demonstration of the progressivity principle and its interactional features, which also points towards the need for specific kinds of future developments in speech technology.
Notes
\emph\textbfWinner of Best Paper Award
