Difference between revisions of "Brown-OHara2003"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (SaulAlbert moved page Brown-O'Hara2003 to Brown-OHara2003 without leaving a redirect)
 
Line 4: Line 4:
 
|Title=Place as a practical concern of mobile workers
 
|Title=Place as a practical concern of mobile workers
 
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Workplace studies; Mobility; Technology; Place;
 
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Workplace studies; Mobility; Technology; Place;
|Key=Brown-O'Hara2003
+
|Key=Brown-OHara2003
 
|Year=2003
 
|Year=2003
 
|Journal=Environment & Planning A: Economy and Space
 
|Journal=Environment & Planning A: Economy and Space

Latest revision as of 06:19, 1 September 2020

Brown-OHara2003
BibType ARTICLE
Key Brown-OHara2003
Author(s) Barry Brown, Kenton O'Hara
Title Place as a practical concern of mobile workers
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Workplace studies, Mobility, Technology, Place
Publisher
Year 2003
Language
City
Month
Journal Environment & Planning A: Economy and Space
Volume 35
Number 9
Pages 1565–1587
URL Link
DOI 10.1068/a34231
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

In this paper we examine the spatial practices of mobile workers—how mobile workers manage their use of technology and place. Data from interviews with highly mobile workers and ‘hot-deskers’ are used to explore the reciprocal relationship between practice and place: how places change work, but also how work changes places. Mobile workers often need to configure their activities to take account of the different places in which they find themselves. This can involve considerable ‘juggling’ of their plans, humble office equipment, and their coworkers. In turn mobile workers change places, as they appropriate different sites for their work. Specifically, technology allows for the limited reappropriation of travel and leisure sites as places for work (such as trains and cafés). Time is also an important practical concern for mobile workers. Although mobile work may be seen as relatively flexible, fixed temporal structures allow mobile workers to ‘accomplish synchronicity’ with others. Although this paper focuses on the specific practices of mobile workers, it also explores how ‘grand social theory’ can help us understand the practical details of mobile work, yet how practice cannot be simply reduced to theory.

Notes