Difference between revisions of "Mlynar2018a"
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
JakubMlynar (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Author(s)=Jakub Mlynář | |Author(s)=Jakub Mlynář | ||
|Title=Proměny a stálost Garfinkelovy etnometodologie | |Title=Proměny a stálost Garfinkelovy etnometodologie | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Harold Garfinkel; Sociology; Phenomenology; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Harold Garfinkel; Sociology; Phenomenology; History of sociology; Work |
|Key=Mlynar2018a | |Key=Mlynar2018a | ||
|Year=2018 | |Year=2018 | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
|Number=2 | |Number=2 | ||
|Pages=172–195 | |Pages=172–195 | ||
| − | |URL= | + | |URL=https://www.sav.sk/journals/uploads/04161101Mlynar%202-2018.pdf |
|Note=Transformations and Continuity of Garfinkel’s Ethnomethodology | |Note=Transformations and Continuity of Garfinkel’s Ethnomethodology | ||
Half-century of the publication of Harold Garfinkel’s Studies in Ethnomethodology (1967) is taken as an occasion for retrospective. The main question of the text is whether we can describe the development of Garfinkel’s oeuvre in terms of continuities or rather in terms of transformations. In spite of the profound changes in Garfinkel’s ethnomethodology, related especially to the ethnomethodological studies of work, its foundation has always been the deep respect to the practical/embodied knowledge of the members in its specific situated expressions, which is for ethnomethodology the central topic of sociology. | Half-century of the publication of Harold Garfinkel’s Studies in Ethnomethodology (1967) is taken as an occasion for retrospective. The main question of the text is whether we can describe the development of Garfinkel’s oeuvre in terms of continuities or rather in terms of transformations. In spite of the profound changes in Garfinkel’s ethnomethodology, related especially to the ethnomethodological studies of work, its foundation has always been the deep respect to the practical/embodied knowledge of the members in its specific situated expressions, which is for ethnomethodology the central topic of sociology. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 01:26, 16 August 2020
| Mlynar2018a | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Mlynar2018a |
| Author(s) | Jakub Mlynář |
| Title | Proměny a stálost Garfinkelovy etnometodologie |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Harold Garfinkel, Sociology, Phenomenology, History of sociology, Work |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2018 |
| Language | Czech |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Sociológia |
| Volume | 50 |
| Number | 2 |
| Pages | 172–195 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Notes
Transformations and Continuity of Garfinkel’s Ethnomethodology
Half-century of the publication of Harold Garfinkel’s Studies in Ethnomethodology (1967) is taken as an occasion for retrospective. The main question of the text is whether we can describe the development of Garfinkel’s oeuvre in terms of continuities or rather in terms of transformations. In spite of the profound changes in Garfinkel’s ethnomethodology, related especially to the ethnomethodological studies of work, its foundation has always been the deep respect to the practical/embodied knowledge of the members in its specific situated expressions, which is for ethnomethodology the central topic of sociology.
