Difference between revisions of "Tseliou2020"
ElliottHoey (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Eleftheria Tseliou; |Title=Discourse Analysis and Systemic Family Therapy Research: The Methodological Contribution of Discursive Psycho...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
| − | |BibType= | + | |BibType=INCOLLECTION |
|Author(s)=Eleftheria Tseliou; | |Author(s)=Eleftheria Tseliou; | ||
|Title=Discourse Analysis and Systemic Family Therapy Research: The Methodological Contribution of Discursive Psychology | |Title=Discourse Analysis and Systemic Family Therapy Research: The Methodological Contribution of Discursive Psychology | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Psychotherapy; Psychotherapy process research; Systemic family therapy; Discursive psychology; Rhetorical analysis; Intersubjective approach; Ideological dilemmas; Methodology | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Psychotherapy; Psychotherapy process research; Systemic family therapy; Discursive psychology; Rhetorical analysis; Intersubjective approach; Ideological dilemmas; Methodology | ||
|Key=Tseliou2020 | |Key=Tseliou2020 | ||
| + | |Publisher=Springer | ||
|Year=2020 | |Year=2020 | ||
|Language=English | |Language=English | ||
| + | |Address=Cham | ||
|Booktitle=Systemic Research in Individual, Couple, and Family Therapy and Counseling | |Booktitle=Systemic Research in Individual, Couple, and Family Therapy and Counseling | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=125–141 |
|URL=https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-36560-8_8 | |URL=https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-36560-8_8 | ||
| − | |DOI= | + | |DOI=10.1007/978-3-030-36560-8_8 |
|Abstract=In this chapter I aim to discuss specific ways in which the theoretical and methodological approach of discursive psychology could contribute to systemic family therapy research. Despite its resonance with systemic family therapy, up-to-date systemic family therapy research has minimally explored its methodological potential for the study of therapeutic dialogue. In this chapter, following a brief overview of discursive psychology, I will discuss three specific theoretical and methodological proposals which indicate its potential, due to their affinity with systemic, family therapy tenets. These include a rhetorical, argumentative perspective to the study of therapeutic conversations; an intersubjective, “systemic” perspective to psychological phenomena like identity; and a historically and politically informed perspective to the study of therapeutic discourse, as depicted in the notion of ideological dilemmas. While providing examples from family therapy studies, I will conclude with a critical appraisal of the methodological potential of discursive psychology for systemic family therapy research. | |Abstract=In this chapter I aim to discuss specific ways in which the theoretical and methodological approach of discursive psychology could contribute to systemic family therapy research. Despite its resonance with systemic family therapy, up-to-date systemic family therapy research has minimally explored its methodological potential for the study of therapeutic dialogue. In this chapter, following a brief overview of discursive psychology, I will discuss three specific theoretical and methodological proposals which indicate its potential, due to their affinity with systemic, family therapy tenets. These include a rhetorical, argumentative perspective to the study of therapeutic conversations; an intersubjective, “systemic” perspective to psychological phenomena like identity; and a historically and politically informed perspective to the study of therapeutic discourse, as depicted in the notion of ideological dilemmas. While providing examples from family therapy studies, I will conclude with a critical appraisal of the methodological potential of discursive psychology for systemic family therapy research. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 01:03, 23 April 2020
| Tseliou2020 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | INCOLLECTION |
| Key | Tseliou2020 |
| Author(s) | Eleftheria Tseliou |
| Title | Discourse Analysis and Systemic Family Therapy Research: The Methodological Contribution of Discursive Psychology |
| Editor(s) | Matthias Ochs, Maria Borcsa, Jochen Schweitzer |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Psychotherapy, Psychotherapy process research, Systemic family therapy, Discursive psychology, Rhetorical analysis, Intersubjective approach, Ideological dilemmas, Methodology |
| Publisher | Springer |
| Year | 2020 |
| Language | English |
| City | Cham |
| Month | |
| Journal | |
| Volume | |
| Number | |
| Pages | 125–141 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-030-36560-8_8 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | Systemic Research in Individual, Couple, and Family Therapy and Counseling |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
In this chapter I aim to discuss specific ways in which the theoretical and methodological approach of discursive psychology could contribute to systemic family therapy research. Despite its resonance with systemic family therapy, up-to-date systemic family therapy research has minimally explored its methodological potential for the study of therapeutic dialogue. In this chapter, following a brief overview of discursive psychology, I will discuss three specific theoretical and methodological proposals which indicate its potential, due to their affinity with systemic, family therapy tenets. These include a rhetorical, argumentative perspective to the study of therapeutic conversations; an intersubjective, “systemic” perspective to psychological phenomena like identity; and a historically and politically informed perspective to the study of therapeutic discourse, as depicted in the notion of ideological dilemmas. While providing examples from family therapy studies, I will conclude with a critical appraisal of the methodological potential of discursive psychology for systemic family therapy research.
Notes
