Difference between revisions of "Asplund-PerezPrieto2020"
ElliottHoey (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Stig-Börje Asplund; Héctor Pérez Prieto |Title=Approaching life story interviews as sites of interaction: Integrating conversation an...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Author(s)=Stig-Börje Asplund; Héctor Pérez Prieto | |Author(s)=Stig-Börje Asplund; Héctor Pérez Prieto | ||
|Title=Approaching life story interviews as sites of interaction: Integrating conversation analysis with a life story approach | |Title=Approaching life story interviews as sites of interaction: Integrating conversation analysis with a life story approach | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Identity | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Identity; Narrative |
|Key=Asplund-PerezPrieto2020 | |Key=Asplund-PerezPrieto2020 | ||
|Year=2020 | |Year=2020 | ||
|Language=English | |Language=English | ||
|Journal=Qualitative Research Journal | |Journal=Qualitative Research Journal | ||
| + | |Volume=20 | ||
| + | |Number=2 | ||
| + | |Pages=175–187 | ||
|URL=https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/QRJ-03-2019-0033/full/html | |URL=https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/QRJ-03-2019-0033/full/html | ||
| − | |DOI= | + | |DOI=10.1108/QRJ-03-2019-0033 |
|Abstract=Purpose | |Abstract=Purpose | ||
The purpose of this paper is to explore what conversation analysis has to offer when analysing a series of life story interviews aiming to capture how reading and texts are used in a rural working-class man’s identity construction. | The purpose of this paper is to explore what conversation analysis has to offer when analysing a series of life story interviews aiming to capture how reading and texts are used in a rural working-class man’s identity construction. | ||
Latest revision as of 00:14, 23 April 2020
| Asplund-PerezPrieto2020 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Asplund-PerezPrieto2020 |
| Author(s) | Stig-Börje Asplund, Héctor Pérez Prieto |
| Title | Approaching life story interviews as sites of interaction: Integrating conversation analysis with a life story approach |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Identity, Narrative |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2020 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Qualitative Research Journal |
| Volume | 20 |
| Number | 2 |
| Pages | 175–187 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1108/QRJ-03-2019-0033 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore what conversation analysis has to offer when analysing a series of life story interviews aiming to capture how reading and texts are used in a rural working-class man’s identity construction.
Design/methodology/approach The conversation analysis methodology with its explicit focus on embodied social action, activity and conduct in interaction is integrated with a life story approach when analysing and describing the identity constructing processes that take place in life story interview settings.
Findings Through a close and detailed analysis of the interaction between interviewer and interviewee, and by focusing and highlighting the phenomena and identities that are oriented to in the face-to-face interaction here and now (and in relation to there and then), descriptions of the complex and dynamic identity constructing processes that are set into play in the life story interview are possible.
Research limitations/implications It is argued that the approach has a lot to offer when approaching life story data, and thus is a method that can increase the transparency in life story interview research.
Originality/value The paper explores the intersection of what is often seen as diametrically opposed forms of analysis: conversation analysis and narrative inquiry.
Notes
