Difference between revisions of "Bregasi2019"
ElliottHoey (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Majlinda Bregasi |Title=Saving Face and Atrocities: Sequence Expansions and Indirectness in Television Interviews |Tag(s)=EMCA; In press...") |
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Author(s)=Majlinda Bregasi | |Author(s)=Majlinda Bregasi | ||
|Title=Saving Face and Atrocities: Sequence Expansions and Indirectness in Television Interviews | |Title=Saving Face and Atrocities: Sequence Expansions and Indirectness in Television Interviews | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Adjacency pairs; Television interview; Interview; Sequential organisation; Thick description; Political discourse; Albanian |
| − | |Key= | + | |Key=Bregasi2020 |
|Year=2019 | |Year=2019 | ||
|Language=English | |Language=English | ||
|Journal=Human Studies | |Journal=Human Studies | ||
| + | |Volume=43 | ||
| + | |Pages=89–106 | ||
|URL=https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10746-019-09519-1 | |URL=https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10746-019-09519-1 | ||
|DOI=https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-019-09519-1 | |DOI=https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-019-09519-1 | ||
|Abstract=This article addresses the conversational process taking place during a TV interview in which the contrast shows up between the canonical procedure overseeing the succession and nature of conversational roles and turn-takings in contemporary media contexts and the preservation of an atavistic attitude tied to a traditional culture, Albanian tradition of oda. The discourse in these chambers is a revered phenomenon in the Albanian culture. The interviewee uses the traditional code of oral communication in the oda as a strategy for saving his honour in public, while the interviewer uses another code, the language of investigative journalism. In this paper, a detailed analysis of this interview shows how the sequences built on a basic adjacency pair operate to allow the interviewee to attempt to save face in a compromising situation. We see how the oda structures override normal turn-taking rules and how the face-work process (Goffman Interaction ritual. Essays on the face-to-face behavior, Doubleday, New York, 1967) is reflected in expanded sequences. We consider this topic as an extension of a potential CA analysis when describing how cultural forms with different procedural rules affect general turn-taking. | |Abstract=This article addresses the conversational process taking place during a TV interview in which the contrast shows up between the canonical procedure overseeing the succession and nature of conversational roles and turn-takings in contemporary media contexts and the preservation of an atavistic attitude tied to a traditional culture, Albanian tradition of oda. The discourse in these chambers is a revered phenomenon in the Albanian culture. The interviewee uses the traditional code of oral communication in the oda as a strategy for saving his honour in public, while the interviewer uses another code, the language of investigative journalism. In this paper, a detailed analysis of this interview shows how the sequences built on a basic adjacency pair operate to allow the interviewee to attempt to save face in a compromising situation. We see how the oda structures override normal turn-taking rules and how the face-work process (Goffman Interaction ritual. Essays on the face-to-face behavior, Doubleday, New York, 1967) is reflected in expanded sequences. We consider this topic as an extension of a potential CA analysis when describing how cultural forms with different procedural rules affect general turn-taking. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 02:56, 11 April 2020
| Bregasi2019 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Bregasi2020 |
| Author(s) | Majlinda Bregasi |
| Title | Saving Face and Atrocities: Sequence Expansions and Indirectness in Television Interviews |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Adjacency pairs, Television interview, Interview, Sequential organisation, Thick description, Political discourse, Albanian |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2019 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Human Studies |
| Volume | 43 |
| Number | |
| Pages | 89–106 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-019-09519-1 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This article addresses the conversational process taking place during a TV interview in which the contrast shows up between the canonical procedure overseeing the succession and nature of conversational roles and turn-takings in contemporary media contexts and the preservation of an atavistic attitude tied to a traditional culture, Albanian tradition of oda. The discourse in these chambers is a revered phenomenon in the Albanian culture. The interviewee uses the traditional code of oral communication in the oda as a strategy for saving his honour in public, while the interviewer uses another code, the language of investigative journalism. In this paper, a detailed analysis of this interview shows how the sequences built on a basic adjacency pair operate to allow the interviewee to attempt to save face in a compromising situation. We see how the oda structures override normal turn-taking rules and how the face-work process (Goffman Interaction ritual. Essays on the face-to-face behavior, Doubleday, New York, 1967) is reflected in expanded sequences. We consider this topic as an extension of a potential CA analysis when describing how cultural forms with different procedural rules affect general turn-taking.
Notes
