Difference between revisions of "Collins-etal2019"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Harry Collins; Willow Leonard-Clarke; Hannah O’Mahoney; |Title=‘Um, er’: how meaning varies between speech and its typed transcrip...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
|Number=6 | |Number=6 | ||
|Pages=653–668 | |Pages=653–668 | ||
| − | |URL=journals.sagepub.com/ | + | |URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1468794118816615 |
| − | + | |DOI=10.1177/1468794118816615 | |
| − | |Abstract=We report a small empirical study on the way the transcription used to represent speech | + | |Abstract=We report a small empirical study on the way the transcription used to represent speech affects its meaning. We show that ‘disfluencies’ in speech indicate far more uncertainty in the speaker when transmitted in text than when transmitted in recorded sound. This has important implications for how transcribed interviews should be edited when they are being used to convey meaning rather than the organization of phonemes. We propose the implications of different ways of representing speech in text could be a new subject for investigation. Presented here is one possible empirical approach to such studies. |
| − | affects its meaning. We show that ‘disfluencies’ in speech indicate far more uncertainty in the | ||
| − | speaker when transmitted in text than when transmitted in recorded sound. This has important | ||
| − | implications for how transcribed interviews should be edited when they are being used to convey | ||
| − | meaning rather than the organization of phonemes. We propose the implications of different | ||
| − | ways of representing speech in text could be a new subject for investigation. Presented here is | ||
| − | one possible empirical approach to such studies. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 02:54, 19 January 2020
| Collins-etal2019 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Collins-etal2019 |
| Author(s) | Harry Collins, Willow Leonard-Clarke, Hannah O’Mahoney |
| Title | ‘Um, er’: how meaning varies between speech and its typed transcript |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, certainty in text and speech, disfluencies, editing of transcripts, interview transcription, meaning, qualitative research, transcribing fillers: um er uh |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2019 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Qualitative Research |
| Volume | 16 |
| Number | 6 |
| Pages | 653–668 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1177/1468794118816615 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
We report a small empirical study on the way the transcription used to represent speech affects its meaning. We show that ‘disfluencies’ in speech indicate far more uncertainty in the speaker when transmitted in text than when transmitted in recorded sound. This has important implications for how transcribed interviews should be edited when they are being used to convey meaning rather than the organization of phonemes. We propose the implications of different ways of representing speech in text could be a new subject for investigation. Presented here is one possible empirical approach to such studies.
Notes
